Wizard Marks wrote: I won't (apologize)David. I'm the source and your reports were biased--still are. And the board, self included, were sick of it. What you reported was those possibilities which most benefited your block and were careful to elide over those possibilities which did not most favor your block.
David Piehl writes: Wizard's assertion of "biased reports" is entirely false, though that doesn't seem to bother her. There is no room for bias in simply submitting PAC minutes, unless the minutes themself (created by Tom Johnson & Erin Armstrong) are biased, and I don't believe they were. I also brought documents produced by PAC for the record, which people were free to peruse. There were no motions to be made, just an informational item for something that the neighborhood needed to be aware of and communicate to residents. If Wizard had attended ANY of those meetings, perhaps she would know that and not have to rely on "sources". Wizard may think that my current commentary is biased, which is a very different thing than reports to the board - I haven't been a part of the board for over two years, so now I am free to speak my mind as basically everyone on this list does. If Wizard is "tired of being called a liar", then she needs get the story right before she tells it - the facts on this issue are very easy to prove from commentary on all sides in the CNIA chat archives and CNIA minutes - as well as taped board meetings. Wizard's assertion is untrue, whether a mistake or a lie. David Piehl Central __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
