Susan Maricle wrote:

>When we first moved to Mpls. in 1989, we considered
>buying a charming house at 38th and Chicago. We knew
>nothing about the neighborhood, so a friend suggested
>we contact the nearby police department to get an
>opinion from them. I still remember the officer's
>words: "It's awful.  You couldn't pay me to live
>here."
>
I live at Lake and Oakland, but you couldn't pay me to live at 38th and 
Chicago. There's an SA station on that corner which means traffic is 
going day and night. Lake St. goes all night too, but without a 
convenience store/gas station, it's very mellow at 2, 3, and 4 am.

>Now, maybe I caught the officer at a bad time on a bad
>day. But if that's the attitude he carries around with
>him, how does it affect his performance? Why does he
>stay in a job if he hates where he works?
>If I were an employer and that cop were my employee,
>how long would I keep him around if he continued to
>badmouth me to potential clients?
>

This issue is a lot more complex than most of us credit. Nobody asks a 
judge whether living at Christmas Lake and working at Henn. Co. 
Courthouse (a.k.a. "the toaster") means he/she can't do a good job. 
Nobody asks my boss, head of Hosmer Library if living around 44th and 
France means he cannot do his job well. He does excellently at some 
things and not so splendidly at others, just like everybody else's boss. 
There's a lieutenant at the 3rd precinct who lives somewhere in 
Minnetonka, but I wouldn't trade her for anything you'd care to offer.

I used to work at Lake and Chicago, right in the middle of the biggest 
mess I hope to ever see. During that period, my attitude toward cops and 
criminals was pretty sour. My attitude toward complacent and/or 
frightened citizen's got off the rails too. I don't have the kind of 
personality to spend so many concentrated hours right in the thick of 
the yuck.

The test for the personality of a police officer, as I understand it, is 
the MMPI. I'm fairly sure the MMPI is not a toolfor fine measurements. 
It can measure perhaps, some gross things, some general categories, but 
that's all.

I divide it up this way. Some people--police officers included--have a 
bunker mentality about life. They think they will be safe if the wear a 
turtle shell, have lots of alarm systems, and close in on themselves, 
defining their ecological niche very narrowly so that everyone they know 
is just like them. (Personally, I think those type of folks are unfair 
to themselves and other hominids, but....)
Some folks let their curiosity out on a long kite string and explore 
here and there. They attempt to 'meet and greet' the world. They're 
bored stiff when everybody's just like them. They don't think they would 
be any safer closed in than out in the mix.
I think of it as a continuum with the bunkerers on one end and the 
totally free spirits on the other with the rest of us sprinkled along 
the string between them.
Where, between the two extremes, are the best cops huddled? Are they all 
together? Do you need a mix? If you can identify that spot(s), then we 
can do a better job of choosing which people are best for which kinds of 
work and, theoretically at least, we would have better police 
departments all round.

1989 was a year when, for the first time in a couple of generations, 
Minneapolis police and citizens were hit with a massive open street drug 
trade. The police dept. didn't really have a clue about how to tackle 
the situation. Neither did anybody else. A lot of cops had bunker 
mentality to the 9th power at the time, citizen's were developing it 
likewise. Some still do. Some always will because they don't have enough 
roughage in their diets.

I don't intend to defend the cops or disparage them (usually), but 
living where I do, I wind up having a lot of interaction with them. I 
have to say, though, I don't care where they live. If they want to 
commute from Outer East Somewhere Else, that's their lookout. It they 
want to live up a flagpole, I'm OK with it. What I want to know is 
whether or not they have the good sense to make friends in their sectors 
so they have a few folks watching their backs and those same folks ready 
and able to challenge them when their behavior goes South.
WizardMarks, Central

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
>http://faith.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to