WM: The differemce is that I'm not running for county commissioner and I don't own newspapers or run them. If anyone wants to support or not support McLaughlin or Felien or a third party, it doesn't have anything to do with me. Whether I'm morally bankrupt (I'm not, though when I do make a mistake it's usually a dousy) or the sweetheart of sigma chi, has nothing to do with it. It's whether or not each opponent can stand on his/her behavior.
JIM GRAHAM wrote >Given what in many people's mind was her previous outright slander of Eddie >Felien, Wizard making a statement such as "The damage is already done. All >of those who read this list and Pulse have already carried a misperception", >is a little much; even for Wizard. > >Even though he has a great hurdle to >overcome, Eddie certainly has the advantage in such media debate, as he has >NO record to stand on and he can pick and choose stances to take. Eddie >also has a publication in which to print his version of the debate as if it >were the truth. > WM: But the issue was not a printed debate, it was a news story in which McLaughlin was misquoted by Felien through a third party. McLaughlin called Felien on it. >(In all honesty even though I may have an inflated sense of >self worth, I must admit the importance of debating on a list that has 800 >members, scattered around the Metro Area is highly debatable in of its self. > WM: Exactly, that's why I think so many politicians don't do it. WizardMarks, Central >______________________________________ >Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy >Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: >http://e-democracy.org/mpls > _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
