I don't think it's proper to forward to the entire list a message that was clearly meant for off list, especially when the message would have been considered inappropriate for the list. I don't think it makes sense to further inflame the list with snide comments when the original poster did not intend the message for the list.
If you don't want flames in your personal mailbox, don't post. And if you're going to post "a different take" on a topic, you should expect flames in your personal mailbox. Bob Alberti, President Sanction, Inc. Data Security http://www.sanction.net Cusp of Longfellow and Seward "A Tempest! Grab the teabag and hang on for your life!" -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mpls-admin@;mnforum.org]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mpls] a different take on Wellstone In a message dated 10/27/2002 12:49:34 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Kindly refrain from replying to me. I assure my niceness is not the > norm. You're entitled to your opinion, even if it shows the world that > you are an Ass. > > The truth is not as you see fit to your agenda. > Sounds like the DFL take on dialog to me. Linda Mann Kingfeild (and member of the Green Party but don't seize on this as a pretext to attack them too) _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
