For what it's worth, I'll share my thinking about the Hennepin County
judicial races. Even for a practicing attorney, the absence of any
real information on these races is startling.
Judge Lloyd Zimmerman v. Julie Delgado-O'Neil --- Zimmerman.
See my previous post - Judge Zimmerman is outstanding. I agree
with Dee Long, Delgado-O'Neil filed to run for the wrong judicial seat.
Judge Thomas Wexler v. Jill Clark ---- Jill Clark.
Caveat - Jill Clark is a friend of mine, she used to be chair of
the state bar's Internet Law Committee. She is smart, and tough, and
thorough.
Jill's challenge to Judge Wexler arises out of an incident that
occurred when she was representing a female Ethiopian immigrant against
a criminal charge of "disturbing the peace by words" in front of Judge
Wexler. The words uttered by the woman used to support the criminal
charge were "You're just arresting me because I'm black." Jill Clark,
very naturally in my opinion, moved to dismiss the charges on First
Amendment grounds. Judge Wexler called counsel back into his chamber
to discuss Jill's motion off the record, and said something to the
effect that if he took her motion seriously "these people" would clog
up the courts forever. As related to me, it was not clear whether
Judge Wexler was referring to criminal defendants generally, or to
immigrants, or to the defendant's race. To be fair, I believe there is
a genuine factual dispute about the precise words and context of this
conference in chambers.
Jill Clark believed that Judge Wexler's comments were inappropriate and
discriminatory, and filed ethics complaint both with the Chief Judge of
Hennepin County and the committee appointed by the Supreme Court to
deal with judicial ethics. I don't know what the results of those
complaints were - but as a rule complaints against judges are rarely
result in a meaningful public outcome.
I do not believe even for a second that Judge Wexler had a
discriminatory motive. In my opinion, Judge Wexler's comment reflected
the opinion of a judge with a full criminal docket who didn't want to
take the time to consider a constitutional argument.
Increasingly judges view their role not as decision-makers, but as
docket managers. Internally, judges are graded on how many cases they
are able to dispose of in a quick fashion. Judges often decide that
cases merit more time and attention based on the seriousness of the
criminal charges, and on the civil side, how much money is at stake.
This attitude, I think, has a terrible effect on poor people. In
practice, a poor person charged with a misdemeanor or a low felony
stands little chance of having their legal or factual defenses properly
considered.
Now if every case were treated like a federal case, state courts would
grind to a halt. In some respects Judge Wexler's comment, sadly, is an
accurate reflection of the facts.
I see Judge Wexler as an able, accomplished judge who has chosen for
practical reasons to operate within the indignities and unfairness of
the criminal justice system. I suspect he manages his docket well, and
handles his civil cases appropriately. But I'd rather have a judge who
strives to give defendants get a fair shake in small cases, even if
that goal is a bit unrealistic.
I'd also rather have a judge who listens to a free speech defense when
the defendant is charged with disturbing the peace "with words."
Jill Clark also has a history of successfully representing victims who
have been injured by the Minneapolis police. When I ran for City
Council last year, Jill and I talked at length (I should say, Jill
talked at length) about the policies and procedures which the
Minneapolis police use which, in her judgment, lend themselves to a
consistent problems with physical altercations. Regardless of the
outcome of the election, I would recommend that the Mayor and City
Council sit down with Jill and explore her suggestions.
Judge Harry Crump v. Kevin Kolosky --- Judge Crump
I don't have a lot of information on this race. I have friends who've
appeared before Judge Crump and describe him as an able judge.
Judge Crump does deserve a lot of credit for his rulings in the Twins
case - and not because of the outcome. I'll spare you the details, but
Judge Crump's reasoning behind his decision -- about the nature of the
consideration involved in the Twins lease -- was right on point.
Judge Steven Aldrich v. Judd Edward Gushwa --- Judge Aldrich
Steve Aldrich is an excellent judge, who has a great deal of expertise
in family cases. Family law is one of those areas where we need expert
judges. Judge Aldrich is definitely not one of those judges who merely
manages his docket.
Steve Aldrich was also a good friend of Rich Rose, who managed my City
Council campaign last year and died earlier this year. Rich Rose
managed Judge Aldrich's first judicial campaign, which was a tough race
against an excellent opponent. IIRC, Judge Aldrich spoke at Rich's
memorial service.
Judge Tanya Bransford v. Joseph "Pat" McCormick --- Judge Bransford
I don't have a lot of information on this race. I have friends who've
appeared before Judge Bransford who describe her as an able judge.
Judge Herbert Lefler v. Liz Pierce --- Judge Lefler
This is a tough one. I've never appeared before Judge Lefler, and I
don't know Liz Pierce. From what I hear, Judge Lefler is well-liked by
both attorneys and court staff -- (which is a significant criteria for
me - IMHO one of the truest tests of character for an elected official
is how they treat the people who work under them). I have some friends
who know Liz Pierce and speak very highly of her.
Absent any reason to reject the incumbent, I'll vote for Lefler -- but
would encourage Liz Pierce to either run again or seek appointment by
the governor.
Judge James Swenson v. Robert D. Schwartz --- Judge Swenson
Judge Swenson has a decent reputation among attorneys I know. Other
than that, I have very little info on the race.
At any rate, that's what I'm doing in the judicial elections on Nov.
5th.
Greg Abbott
------------------------------------
Sent from the computer of:
Greg Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linden Hills
13th Ward (612) 925-0630
------------------------------------
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
- [Mpls] Fwd: Minneapolis Star Tribune Endorses Tim Penny RANDERSON67
- [Mpls] List focus List Manager
- [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump!! Dean Carlson
- Re: [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump!! Barbara Lickness
- Re: [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump!! Jordan Kushner
- Re: [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump... WizardMarks
- Re: [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump!! WizardMarks
- Re: [Mpls] Don't Forget Judge Crump... Jordan Kushner
- [Mpls] Keep Judge Zimmerman Greg Abbott
- Re: [Mpls] Other judicial r... Greg Abbott
- Re: [Mpls] Other judicial r... phaedrus
