Tom Berthiaume wrote:
"Why would the Mayor secretly push these zoning
changes that will surely increase racial and
economic segregation? It might be his solution to
the Lydia House and Collaborative Village law
suits and others that are sure to follow. If you
get a chance, ask him. And also ask him, the
Shelter Advisory Board, and the Council Members
how many supportive housing facilities are
near their residences. Would it be fair to guess
there won't be 17?"

For starters, I hope a rep comes on here to
explain RT's reasoning. But, hey, if you have
solid evidence of both cases, rich and poor
neighborhoods, why not post it here?  If you
visit the mayor's office and present the
evidence, why not write down the response and
post it here?  Steve Brandt MIGHT find a good
story in it and get a political reporter to put
it in the newspaper, a "community activism"
story.  And we can also distribute it across the
web, too.  I have a website and would post a
story on it.  I participate in many chat areas
and would help spread the information. I might do
some checking before I did, but if I found
reasons to publicize it, I would.

As channels of news get more and more
concentrated, the people will have to find and
exploit new channels as a way to keep good
government alive.  The TV stations have tiplines,
so that is another place to plant the seeds.

Lets not give up till we get an answer about how
much concentration there is and how equitably
zoning laws are enforced.  It could be the germ
of a campaign for zoning equity.  Heck, maybe
someday soon someone will become a candidate for
local government with that as a major plank
(Maybe Eddie F?) 

Steven Meldahl: 
"VAfter a 2 year battle,  I eventually lost on a
technicality that stated that any decision of the
City Council is a "quasi judicial " decision and
must be appealed directly to the Appellate Court
by a writ of certiori."

Hmmm.  Was that an established principle of law
that you should have known going in?  Was your
legal representation high-caliber?

Steven Meldahl:
"The still evident litigious attitude of the City
is not in my opinion caused by any of the current
City Council members.  It rests directly at the
feet of Jay Heffern, the head City attorney.  He
has instructed his flock of city attornieys not
to settle anything!"

Whoa!  That must be a new development. I well
remember repeated news stories of the city
settling because "otherwise we'd have court costs
and end up paying even more".  That was part of
my reason for wanting the City Council leadership
dumped.  They were getting us taxpayers into
stuff where they didn't have a prayer of a
defense.  That was legal stupidity.

Mike Nelson:
"I put signs up for a campaign last year, and had
a list of names and addresses for every sign
requested. After the election, we went out and
collected them."

I know Doug Mann did that.  I figured he might
want them around for a future run. I was gonna
drop my Mann sign on his porch but I came home
one day and it was gone.  So Doug tidies up our
city on his own.  A pat on the back, Doug.












=====
Jim Mork
Cooper Neighborhood
------------
Progressive Minnesotans, get together at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MN_progressive_tradition/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to