on 11/14/02 10:47 AM, Dave Harstad at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Its a huge tactical mistake to create two different > density requirements, one for affordable housing and > one for "non affordable housing."
Here's another question (apologies if this has already been answered): would the zoning change if the affordability ever goes away? In other words, if the city permits a 24-unit building where the "non-affordable" standard is 20 units, and then a few years later the affordable units become market-rate, would the owner be required to keep 4 units vacant? Seems unlikely, but possible. Also, how is affordability monitored by the city? Do property owners send in rent reports? Are they audited? Or is it pretty much the honor system? David Brauer King Field Who believes the road to hell is paved with good intentions...but so is the path to heaven. _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
