> >
> WM: One of the problems with rent stamps, a.k.a. Section 8, is the
> bureaucratic requirements which make it one tricky business to evict a
> tenant for cause. Enter the non-profit. They specialize in moving
> paperwork around to suit the parameters of federal money. They have
> special software and everything. They have rules to which they hold
> tenants accountable. They never assume that of course people know how to
> live in a house. Commercial landlords/ladies really are not set up to
> handle that type of workload.
>
> I don't have a solution and I don't know that what we have presently is
> anything more than a bandaid. It is a problem looking for solutions.
>
> WizardMarks, Central


(CM)

Section 8 has taken a step backward recently.  One reason Section 8 Tenants
were unable to get apartments throughout the early-mid-to late nineties was
the one year lease requirement.  Plain and simple, the landlord had to sign
a one year lease with the resident.  As Wizard has pointed out, getting
someone out for violating the lease under Sect 8 is 'tricky'.  That is an
understatement.

Well a few years ago, Sect 8 seeing the crisis decided to offer month to
month leases.  This was good news.  Most of us landlords started to rent to
those on Sect 8 again.  If the tenant screwed up, you gave them notice.
That simple.
30 days was the most you had to put up with.

Now, It is my understanding that Sect 8 is going back to one year minimum.
This indicates two things.
1. The affordable housing crisis is over.
2.  The Feds believe that enough landlords will take the risk on a one year
lease.   They need their apartments rented.

It will cause many landlords to quit Sect 8 again.  That's too bad.  Why
must Section 8 insist on the one years lease?
It's counter productive.

Craig Miller
Former Fultonite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to