Bob Alberti, speaking of the government's role in small business lending,
says:
> ...the logic of course is that the government is not
> trying to make a
> short term cash return on an investment...
> The
> government is trying to make a long-term tax return on their
> investment, in
> the form of creating jobs as well as creating a tax-paying business.

[MH] Looks like what we have here Bob, are divergent views/philosophies on
the role of government in society; and, on the question of what should
taxpayer money be used for.

Is it the proper role of government to use limited public funds to subsidize
high-risk (e.g. they can't get funds from conventional lenders) private
business endeavors (especially start ups), and in the process, determine
which businesses get funding and which don't?  (vs. adequately funding
schools, roads, sewerage, crime, healthcare, etc.)

In my experience, the government doesn't do a very good job trying to create
private sector jobs... plain and simple.  And don't forget, along with such
government funding programs (each and every one) comes the government and
non-profit overhead needed to administer, implement and maintain each
program (and at each level of gov't. with pass through funds).  I'd
characterize these programs as being successful in creating jobs in the
support-bureaucracy arena, while providing little, if any, net gain on the
street-- as measured by cost-benefit, i.e. the PV flow of relevant tax
receipts ten years after the investment- including overhead.

To my mind, taxpayers shouldn't be expected to subsidize high-risk business
endeavors that benefit a few individuals and their businesses, especially in
cases where there is little-to-no equity investment involved.  It's a role
for the private sector.  [I'd make similar arguments against government
subsidies to large private businesses (ala Target and Block E), although the
arguments are much more complex and there is usually (or should be)
significant equity brought forward in such circumstances (not an
apples-to-apples comparison); issues brought forward for discussion in a
recent post by Tom Leighton.]

> One may as well ask what the return is on building a bridge or a
> road.

Using public funds to build bridges and roads that serve the general public
should be a justifiable taxpayer expense. I don't see the relevancy in
comparison with the sub-prime / government lending to private business
topic.

Although, in outlying areas, broad-based public subsidy for the extension of
municipal infrastructure is increasingly being questioned.  It is argued
that the cost of such 'sprawl' should be more heavily allocated toward those
creating the demand for service.  A 'general tax' vs. a 'fee' argument if
you will, currently being discussed at state/regional levels (and in the
communities creating the new 'demands.'

Michael Hohmann
Linden Hills
www.mahohmannbizplans.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bob Alberti
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:01 PM
> To: Mpls Forum
> Subject: RE: [Mpls] Subprime lenders and gov't. spending
snip
> Speaking as a small business operator whose loans come entirely from Visa
> (i.e. I'm not trying to justify or rationalize something from which I
> benefit), the logic of course is that the government is not
> trying to make a
> short term cash return on an investment, as was  Conseco
> (supposedly).  The
> government is trying to make a long-term tax return on their
> investment, in
> the form of creating jobs as well as creating a tax-paying business.
>
> One may as well ask what the return is on building a bridge or a
> road.  Not
> too many businesses doing that, either.
>
> Bob Alberti, President      Sanction, Inc. Data Security
> http://www.sanction.net    Cusp of Longfellow and Seward
> "Are you sure that the data on your computer is secure?"
snip

_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to