I think one thing that hurt Shane's numbers were
Trish's 107 votes.  Many of Trish's supporters who
have voted
--- David Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious about people's explanations for the
> astoundingly poor showing by
> Shane Price last night...the representative of
> Minneapolis's "second party"
> (the Greens) received about half the vote of the
> endorsed Republican for an
> open seat.
> 
> I am no expert on the 3rd ward, but a couple of
> guesses pop to mind:
> 
> 1. Shane was a great repository for a protest vote
> in 2001, but when the
> protest source (Biernat) was gone, so was the
> candidacy. Interestingly,
> three DFLers finished ahead of Shane - proving that
> the DFL "brand" is not
> poison in the city...as long as DFL alternatives
> emerge to
> incumbents/endorsees (think Rybak over Sayles
> Belton).
> 
> Side note: I understand Don Samuels received a
> letter from the city party
> telling him to desist in using the term
> "Democratic-Farmer-Labor candidate"
> on his literature. Personally, I think the only
> thing that would have been
> objectionable is if he'd called himself the DFL
> "endorsee" (which Olin Moore
> won fair and square). Such pressure is
> short-sighted: if Samuels wins, the
> party will need him more than the other way around.
> He becomes a strong
> possibility as the party's standard-bearer in '05
> against Natalie Johnson
> Lee (since Samuels lives in the new 5th Ward).
> 
> Disclaimer: I'm not predicting a Samuels win, this
> year or in '05. But the
> above is a scenario that sure could happen.
> 
> 2.  Shane simply didn't have the campaign that
> Samuels (or Olin) did. The
> Samuels campaign brain trust had several veterans of
> the Rybak campaign, or
> Rybak's supporters. I think the inside story of the
> night was their use of
> absentee ballots - heretofore a tactic perfected by
> state and national
> Republicans. I heard that the Samuels campaign
> submitted 175 absentee
> ballots out of 183 cast....and roughly half of his
> 363-vote primary total.
> Nothing illegal about it, and smart as heck for a
> Dec. 30 race. Getting
> residents to fill out absentee ballots DURING
> doorknocking may be the wave
> of the future - it IS perfectly legal - and that was
> much more than Samuels'
> margin over Margo and Valdis.
> 
> Disclaimer to wave of the future: it's probably
> easier to get residents to
> fill out an absentee ballot at the door when there's
> only one race on the
> ballot.
> 
>  Other explanations welcome and encouraged.
> 
> David Brauer
> King Field
> 10th ward today, 8th ward down the road
> 
> _______________________________________
> 
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic
> Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to