RT brings up petitioning our congress people, and it
certainly makes sense to collect signatures for both
petitions at the same time.

###

In the past week, we've had two events:

* A report of a man sitting in his living room near a
corner known for drug dealing as a bullet flew through
followed (4 days later) by shots exchanged between
police and a gun man who had already been shooting at
someone or something else.

* A report of police beating and urinating on a drunk
man who was a homeless minority.

Why we need the police, why we need police oversight
and accountability, and why the drug war is
"fundamentally flawed".

I see a number of things that the city could do to
improve things:

* Start seriously exploring ways to get out of the
drug war and to decriminalize drugs to the point where
they are no longer an income stream for thugs and a
pathway into a criminal lifestyle for people with few
options. This needs some creative and bold thinking.
Prohibition doesn't work, but since the federal
government insists on keeping it on the books, we need
to find a way around it.

* Create true police accountability. Every complaint
about police behavior is taken, investigated and
responded to in a timely manner. Officers who are
abusing their position should be removed (and charged
with any crimes they've committed behind the shield of
the badge) AND officers who are doing their job should
not have to deal with the fallout created by thugs on
the force. It should be very clear that any officer
who knows of another officer breaking the law and NOT
reporting it is aiding and abetting. Make sure that
people feel safe and confident that they will not be
retaliated against for making reports.

* Support the police department. Make sure there are
enough police that the streets can be patrolled and
calls for help are responded to in a timely fashion.
Make sure no streetcorner is left abandoned. Make sure
that police who have had to deal with a lot of tough
situations get rotated into other areas on a regular
basis so they don't get "hardened".

* Push our judges to be both tougher and more
compassionate. If someone commits a "victimless
crime", figure out a way to help them rather than
institutionalize them. If someone is a thug who is
victimizing other people, get them off the streets.
Don't make the police have to arrest the same guy 200
times.

###

Regarding Dennis' amazement about the State DFL
sending out campaign lit, I had also been under the
impression that someone had stated that the state DFL
would not be involved in this election. Followup posts
have made it clear that the sending of a sample ballot
is standard procedure, but it seems reasonable to
believe that Dennis was suprised by it. I don't think
he was trying to make it an issue discrediting the
candidate.

###

I somehow get the sense that if Don Samuels had been
endorsed by the DFL, we would not be hearing a thing
about his decision to go with a minority owned 3rd
ward printer.

Also, by trying to turn his use of a non-union
minority printer into an "anti-worker agenda" with NO
other supporting evidence, I get the sense that Dyna
has found very few flaws with Don Samuels.

Incidently, when I questioned the statement of
anti-labor, it was stated that it was clear that
"labor" and "union" are interchangeable. I'd agree
that "Labor" and "union" are interchangeable, I'd say
that "labor" is pushing it, and "worker" isn't even
close.

Especially after some of the discussions with union
members I've had in the last year talking about how
the workers had to more or less organize within the
unions to take on union leadership.

Some unions represent the workers while others have
become just another boss. When it comes down to it,
I'm much more concerned about how the workers, the
labor, is treated and compensated. If a union allows
their company to abuse another class of workers (eg:
cub/rainbow), they aren't supporting labor in my eyes.

If you support labor, you support all workers who are
being abused, especially those who are pushed down so
hard that they haven't been able to organize. That's
why I don't go to target or walmart. That's why I
won't drink coke until they deal with their columbian
division (among other complaints). That's why I won't
wear Nike. etc.

Now, I don't know what company Don Samuels used, but
provided they pay their employees a fair and
competitive wage with fair and competitive benefits, I
don't see him as anti-worker or anti-labor.

On the other hand, when someone decides to wear nike,
shop at walmart or target, etc., I must conclude that
at the best, they don't care about workers rights - at
least not enough to inconvenience themselves.

I'm more concerned with action than lip service.
Behavior counts infinitely more than a label does.

####

- Jason Goray
Sheridan, NE

(what to address first? homelessness? police
brutality? crime? alternative transportion? abandoned
neighborhoods? the plight of palestine? freeways and
pollution? corruption? the war with iraq? us
supporting coups in venezuala? instant runoff voting?
alternative energy? etc? etc? etc? i know why
activists get so grumpy - there's so much sh*t going
on that i feel guilty if i take time off to read a
book. i swear, i feel like it'd be easier just to get
hit by a car and not have to worry about it any more.)


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to