Wizard is correct about protocol in this situation.  RT Rybak very clearly
needs a "Native Liaison" to help him with public relations. Gordon Thayer
attempted to give RT an easy and dignified way to ingratiate himself to the
Native Community.  He gave RT Rybak a chance to apologize on behalf of the
City of Minneapolis for the Minneapolis Police Department's mistreatment of
Indian people. Mr. Thayer offered the opportunity as a method of moving on
and putting bad relations behind, so the Minneapolis Police and the Native
Community could come together as one to face the future together.  RT
unfortunately did not sense the opportunity presented, so he passed it off
as if he were being personally criticized.  RT clearly needed some better
political advice. Such a gesture would have cost nothing, would have
admitted nothing, but would have opened the door to better relations.  RT
was politely coaxed a couple of times to seize the moment, but just could
not comprehend it. Instead of seizing the opportunity to become the hero, RT
made the incredible mistake of seeming to take personal offence. He probably
did not, but that appearance, (even if justified) was not wise.

After that coaxing by well meaning people failed, Clyde Bellecourt came back
with the admonition, "Anyone who has to be forced to apologize doesn't
really mean it, so it does not matter". It reminded me of the old adage that
someone's pride "snatched defeat from the jaws of success".  Someone's lack
of perception into traditional culture allowed an opportunity to pass.
There is nothing sadder than watching a squandered opportunity as it passes
out of sight down the road of what could have beens.

Later in the meeting I came to the microphone and suggested that such a
gesture was completely appropriate.  The United States has urged the
Japanese to do such an apology for years to better relations between them
and the US service men and to the Chinese.  They have also allowed arrogance
and false pride keep them from it. How was this any different?  Officials
even admit that it historically happened.  What could an apology for an
admitted wrong hurt? I noted that while the Mayor's apology on behalf of
Minneapolis would have been nice, the official action of Minneapolis
required a resolution from the City Council.  I asked Robert Lillegren to
consider joining other of his colleges to offer such a resolution.  Robert
answered that he would indeed.  He then stood and opening his upheld hands
said that even though he was only new to the Council that he "Was sorry, so
very sorry for the Historical abuse of Native people by Minneapolis Police".
Robert Lillegren did the right thing.  It is yet to be seen if the Council
will follow his lead when he offers the resolution.

I also suggested that the Franklin Safty Center would be the appropriate
place to start an "Minneapolis Police Department Native Liason Office". Such
an office would give native people from the community a chance to view the
police as "their police force"; not as an occupying force.  It would also
allow police officers to form better relations with Indian people. By the
way many police officers do have very good relations with many in the Native
community.  The Franklin Avenue Safty Center is the result of that
relationship between Native, Community, and the Police Department.  Sharon
Lubinski, Kris Arneson, Shirley Stone, Gael Baez, and Jan Graham are
responsible for the Safty Center in donated space from an American Indian
Shopping Center.  I can think of no better use of that space for a few hours
a week or a more appropriate place for it.

As for the presence of Chief Robert Olson, I believe he was indeed sick.
Robert Olson has always been more than eager to meet even with small groups
of community people.  When Sharon Sales-Belton would not do so, Chief Olson
was urging better communication with the community.  If he were not indeed
sick, nothing short of an order from the Mayor could have kept him from
being there.  Olson would have understood the failed opportunity.  Inspector
Sharon Lubinski was present at the meeting and Lt. Kris Arneson helped serve
food.  There were good relations being shared by many police officers and
community people until the Mayor failed to seize the presented opportunity.

Recently on the List someone attacked Inspector Lubinski and Robert Olson
because they were responsible in some way for the "brutality" of police.
These are clearly foolish comments.  Robert Olson has had such bad relations
with the Police Federation in part because he will not tolerate such
actions, and is viewed by some police as not being supportive and protective
enough when incidents of police misdeeds occur.  Sharon Lubinski is possibly
the most respected and beloved police official working in all of
Minneapolis.  Loved not only by the communities, but also respected by the
police officers working for her.  She is someone who DEMANDS professionalism
from Third Precinct Officers.

Lubinski is also the most personally "involved with the community" Inspector
I can remember.  The level of professionalism that she and Captain Mike
Martin brought to what had previously been the worst precinct in Minneapolis
is remarkable.  From being the worst precinct in Minneapolis, where the
worst police officers were assigned (against their will), the Third is now
the place the "Good" police officers want and seek to work.  I cannot
imagine a better Chief than Inspector Lubinski or Captain Mike Martin, when
RT replaces Olson, (which is clearly the plan unless the Council
intervenes).  Both are "Real" police officers that command and receive the
highest respect from both Police Officers as well as from grateful
communities and neighborhoods. Of course RT seems likely to attempt to
appoint a political cronies, (possibly being presently prepared for the
spot?), than to appoint a true "Professional".

Possibly another failed opportunity?

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village

>"If you board the wrong train, it is no use running along the corridor in
the other direction."


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to