It seems that some read without comprehending.

The Delucchi article is talking about the MARGINAL social cost of driving
versus using transit.  I will quote from page 10:  "The marginal cost is the
cost of an incremental unit of a resource, as distinguished from the average
cost of a great many units."  See also the example on page 11.

He is not talking about average cost, nor is he talking about the
construction costs.  Heavy rail, when talking about transit is subway or
commuter rail, not travel cross-country on the Empire Builder.

Around here, the transit fares pay about 1/3 of the operating and maintenance
costs and the average trip length is a little under 6 miles.  Taking a local
fare, not express, of $1.25, that means a subsidy of $2.50, which means a
subsidy of 40 cents per passenger mile just for O&M costs.

I observe that there is a line for unpriced parking, which he downplays in
the text.  If you are a believer in the idea that no parking should be free,
let's start with a requirement that there be meters on all streets within
1/4 mile of a business, service, recreational facility, place of worship,
government office, etc. and that the price of the parking will be based
upon the current market cost of land in the area it sits on.  So-called
private parking (homes, churches, the Zoo, whatever) must all install
meters.  Now ask the businesses on Grand Avenue, Hennepin, Nicollet, Lake,
University how they like the idea.  Ask your neighbors.

If you dislike his conclusions, don't ask me where I calculated the
figures because I didn't.  Ask the author, who has been doing research at
UCTC for at least 10 years and is likely far from being a "post-doc".  If
you are interested in his background, I'm sure the internet could help
you find out.  Ad-hominem attacks are usually baseless.

Don't make the mistake of using the AAA figures for the average cost per
mile of buying a new car every three years, which might be 45 cents if you
are buying higher-end cars.  My cost per vehicle mile is running about
25 cents, IF I use the current gas prices, over the 15 years that I own a
car.  However, the miles I drive with one passenger are at 12.5 cents per
passenger mile and the miles I drive with three passengers are at 6.25
cents.

Chris Johnson quotes studies that say that "efficient user fees might
increase the cost of driving a car by 20 to 50 cents per mile, a 200% to
500% increase over current costs."  Those who are good with math will
understand that if an increase of 20 cents is a 200% increase, that means
that the current cost is 10 cents.  Can anyone tell from that clip whether
they are talking about average costs (well above 10 cents) or marginal
costs?  He also says that 200% to 500% is magnitudes to him.  Most people
use the term "orders of magnitude" each of which is a tenfold increase,
or 1000%.  That is what I was using in my reaction.  If he was using an
unusual turn of phrase, then he is right.

I'm glad to hear that the people of California decided to build lrt instead
of freeways.  I was under the impression that there was no referendum
held and didn't realize that everything was wonderful there because they
are all riding the lrt between Sacramento and San Diego.

Visit www.effectivetransit.org

The Independent Unsubsidized Voice of
Citizens for Effective Transit in the Twin Cities  (no lrt)

* lrt isn't a potato chip, you can stop at just one *

Bruce Gaarder
Highland Park  Saint Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to