SUMMARY:  Booker T Hodges and Ron Edwards did not lie.  The Ellison -
Higgins fund raiser was scheduled, twice.  They printed flyers.  Twice,
giving the date and location (Linda's home).  The story about it appeared in
the Spokesman and was old news before Ron put it on his web log.  You can
tell Booker T was NOT quoting Ron, as Ron never indicated a date nor a
location, although Booker T did.  There is a terrible double standard here.
Higgins is taken at her word, despite her artful spin (and it is a glorious
job indeed; one of the best I've seen), yet Booker T and Ron are not.  I am
troubled that those complaining did not double fact check because of their
eagerness to smear the reputations of Booker T and Ron.  Both Booker T and
Ron have the proof.  They acted independently.  Both care enough about the
community to speak the truth.  And if that means exposing the DFL as serving
itself rather than the community, they will say so.  But the truth is not
wanted.  So they call the truth tellers liars.  And people want to know why
there is such tension in this town along racial lines.  Very cleverly,
Higgins is trying to get people to shoot the messengers of truth for her.

DETAILS.    When I read Linda's post I immediately got on the phone to call
my contacts.  None of my contacts have ever misled me.  Which makes me
wonder why Linda is so willing to mislead and squander her credibility.  But
because her spin was so artful, she has nothing to retract except her
self-confessed crankyness, which is also part of her spin.  I can only
conclude that too many want Booker T and Ron discredited precisely because
they speak the truth.  Booker T and Ron expose the reality that the truth is
for sale, as seen in the fact that most of Jackie's files are missing, about
which the White community has raised not a whimper in complaint.

MORE BACKGROUND.  Higgins is very clever.  She protests reading about a fund
raiser that is not being held on a specific date.  That is true.  It is not
on that date.  What is not true is the implication that it was never
planned.  There is the lie.  It was scheduled.  The flyers exist.  She
suckers others to then shill for her and tell the list that what Ron wrote
is a LIE (yes, it was capitalized).  The leap is ten made about the
redistricting bill being dead, as if in death it never existed and that in
death it doesn't represent an attempt by the DFL machine to steam roller the
elections.  Is this said to lull people into sleep so they can try again?
Because Booker T and Ron have written about this the DFL has chosen to
slander them.
.
REDISTRICTING COVER UP.  What irks people is that both Booker T and Ron DO
know how the political process works (and both the stone walling from the
police chief and city council on mediation and the denials about the
redistricting gamet have been a "politics 101" repeat for some and a real
eye opener for others).  Another complaint is that the DFL is being credited
for being organized when they say it is not.  More spin.  The redistricting
plot discussed in Chapters 12 and 13 of Ron's book shows tremendous
organization and strategy, as does Jackie's taking most of her files.  So
yes, they are giving the DFL credit for trying to derail the elections, for
trying to get rid of Natalie Johnson Lee and for trying to pave the way for
Jackie's return.  If she doesn't run again it will be precisely because the
community people understand the process and stepped up to fight it and beat
them.  Note Linda doesn't say Jackie isn't planning or isn't intent on
returning.  That is a nice omission on Linda's part and part of her artful
spin.  And, their opposition to a DFL "machine" is precisely because of what
the DFL has done to hobble and hold down Blacks in Minneapolis.  This is
another example of the DFL serving itself not the people.  This is but one
more example to go along with the many in Ron's book, "The Minneapolis
Story, Through My Eyes."  That story continues.

So what is this all about?  I believe two things.  First, to cover Jackie
until she can make whatever moves she is planning.  I suspect we'll know
soon enough.  Secondly, to discredit two fine journalists who have gotten
too close to the truth the DFL doesn't want published.  The Star Tribune
goes along and doesn't publish it either

Which raises the question of what are they so desperate to hide that they
would attack Booker T and Ron for speaking the truth.  I suspect we'll find
that out soon enough as well.
Peter Jessen, Portland, www.BeaconOnTheHill.com, publisher of
www.TheMinneapolisStory.com.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
List Manager
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mpls] Jackie - please end thread

Hi folks -

This topic seems sure-fire to cross the line of our rules against
inflammatory dialogue..and with few facts, it has.

The only one who's qualified to answer the "will Jackie run?" question is
Jackie Cherryhomes. If she chooses to respond, she has an open invitation
here.

But until/if she does, let's let the thread die. This is a sure-fire
flame-maker.

David Brauer
List manager

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change
the subject (Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
2. If you don't like what's being discussed here, don't complain - change the subject 
(Mpls-specific, of course.)

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to