Again, please, let's not tail-chase. This isn't a list about discussing the list.
Anyone is welcome to announce a new Minneapolis list, or a Minneapolis-rules-discuss list. However, as I've tried patiently and respectfully to indicate, discussing the list, your likes and dislikes, etc. is not an appropriate topic here. Please, back to city issues. Sincerely, David Brauer List manager > Topic Restrictions > You know, there was a time when I tried to start a Minneapolis issues list > with fewer restrictions and a reduced burden on the moderator (me). Very > few people ever signed up. My conclusion about that at the time was simply > that there is almost no sentiment for being released from the restrictions. > Of course, someone else could try my experiment again, just to test that > theory. If someone does, I will certainly sign up. David says this is a > great burden on the volunteers, so you might be doing him a big favor. I > think anyone who does it SHOULD be prepared with a laisser-faire approach, > not constantly reprimanding people on the list. The charter of this list > seems to make that necessary, and it is not the most attractive aspect of > the list. I think the two posts a day are a bit tight, but I could see that REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
