Jim Mork's post is that strange mix of things you might agree with and
things you shake your head about.

1.  Shooting.  I doubt very much if the shooting involved a "legal" gun.
The reason for my doubt is that the news did talk about some past problems
with the St Paul Courts, so it is very doubtful that the woman had a "permit
to carry".  But it would have been nice for the Strib to point out that this
WAS an illegal gun and had nothing to do with the new law.  So coming from a
different direction I agree with Mork that the reporting was not as complete
as it should have been.

2. Impacted.  I believe the word "Impact" was in the English language (and
with its understood meaning) for sometime before Jim Mork worked at the
Government Center.  The word use is proper in this circumstance.  Not just
because it is what the word is understood to mean, but also because it has
some legal understanding. "Impacted areas" are defined as those areas having
too great a concentration of poverty or too great a concentration of
minority residents.  Court and Federal Policy have defined certain areas of
Minneapolis as being "Impacted Areas".  When crime statistics are looked at,
when concentrations of supportive housing is looked at, when residences for
level three sex offenders is looked at, when housing for those on supervised
probation are looked at, (and almost any other factor that most people would
consider negative is looked at) then you will find them concentrated in
those same "Impacted Areas" and "Impacted Neighborhoods".  Those statistics
are so overwhelming that one would have to be "crazy" not to see the
implications.

3. Crazy.   As crazy as it seems we in Phillips and Ventura Village are
looking forward to a little gentrification. Our Master Planning even
envisions it.  The difference is we have attempted to plan ways for OUR poor
to become "gentrified" rather importing the "gents".  Affordable
homeownership is one of the ways we have planned, with higher density,
compact use and economic development tied to proximity to downtown and mass
transit.  We have never envisioned KEEPING people poor.  That is what has
put City "Planners" and Officials at odds with us.  The "Officials" and
"Planners" plan on ways to maintain the neighborhood as a containment zone
for poverty and crime. While we prefer to find ways to empower and advantage
our present residents.  The City's "Plan" was to concentrate the problems
until the property became worthless and then displace the people and
bulldoze for big developer and non-profiteer buddies. If "Downtown" wants to
bulldoze near downtown perhaps the Kenwood area might be available? No, they
probably have different "plans". We defiantly DO have different plans!

4. Racism.  Other than that Swedes being "Super Caucasian" comment I would
have to agree with Jim Mork. The "Cultural Differences" probably are more
problematic for many people than the "race" of the person.  After the fact
the person adds race to the explanation. Recently Robert Cook, my neighbor,
and I had a heated and enjoyable debate on the Oscar-Shane fight.  Both of
us being from Arkansas cotton fields and boxers make for a heated, and
somewhat loud, friendly conversation.  It also means a lot of gesturing with
fists, mock boxing to make a point, and ending the conversations several
times with comments that bring the other party heatedly back to the
conversation again.  After this very enjoyable moment we noticed that many
of our "White" and Latino neighbors were cautiously watching us and clearly
thinking they were watching a fight about to break out.  Rather than two
good friends having fun about a boxing match and the bet they made.  A
police officer from the suburbs who might have been driving by could have
mistakenly thought an altercation was happening, and if he or she had
stopped to discourage it, probably would have had a couple of laughingly
belligerent people to deal with.

This is one of the reasons we need to recruit police officers from our own
City.  It does not have to be just one minority or another, but they should
defiantly be residents from our neighborhoods. Our own young people do have
an "advanced degree" in our own inner-city people's culture.  That is a
valuable skill set that should be recruited for and given advantage when
hiring officers.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village

>"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad
judgment."



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to