Since Doug Mann has been discussing the recent history of the
NAACP, I thought I'd give my own historical perspective.  I found a letter
to the editor of the Strib that I wrote in 1998 about the NAACP, which I've
copied below (it was not printed in the paper).  Doug Mann has been very
unhappy with the recent leadership of the NAACP, apparently because the
leadership is so ensconced with the institutions of the city, that they have
no interest in changing the status quo.  I say, sure, change the leadership
to more activist types, but please don't go back to the activities of the
'90's.  Ten years ago the NAACP was resolutely dragging racial harmony
backwards.  At least the recent leadership hasn't made things worse.

March 28, 1998
Editorial Department
Star Tribune
425 Portland Ave. S
Minneapolis, MN 55488
RE: Letter to the Editor
For many years now, I have considered any endorsement of a politician by the
Minneapolis Police Federation to be a demerit for that politician. The
Federation has long been a hindrance to attempts to increase the
professionalism or effectiveness of this city's police force. The last straw
for me came when the Police Federation used Jerry Haaf's murder as a way to
make political points. Because the Federation didn't like the mediation
going on between a high-level Minneapolis police official with some
Minneapolis gangs, they used the totally ridiculous argument that this
mediation was related to Jerry Haaf's murder.

Now I've added the NAACP to my short list of "anti-endorsements." Like the
Police Federation, any politician will have to be pretty good to overcome an
endorsement by the NAACP. For years, the NAACP has been fighting any
attempts to better the education of Minneapolis kids, if it also decreases
the racial diversity in any schools. I suspect that one of the reasons for
the much discussed 91% failure rate of Black kids on one test is
Minneapolis' top-down approach to education, which cuts off parents from the
schooling process. Busing kids all over Minneapolis is one aspect of the
top-down approach. When your kid goes to school on the other side of the
city, it is tough to get involved with that school. And it is tough to find
other parents with kids at the same school to discuss the issues, and to
find parents to ally with to bring change to the school. And putting a kid
on a bus for two hours a day takes away from both learning and playing time.
Now the NAACP wants to bus the kids all over the county. Racial diversity is
their mantra, and they seem to think it is the only thing that matters.

When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1954 that separation of the Races is
inherently unequal, they were talking about a government that systematically
gave more resources to the White school than the Black school. In that
culture of White supremacy, the justices were right - separation of the
Races would always result in lower educational resources for the Black
schools. The NAACP has turned that ruling into gospel. To them integration
is a cure for all that ails. Any attempt to improve education, if it also
increases racial segregation as a by-product, is not acceptable. So they
won't give community education a chance.

But what finally clinched the argument against the NAACP was their boorish
behavior at the Board of Education meetings. The NAACP apparently believes
that shutting down public meetings advances democracy. Compare the number of
NAACP members who shut down the meeting to the numbers of votes each Board
member received in the last election. I think the Board has a lot more right
to claim they are representing the people. Everyone I voted for in the Board
of Education election lost, but I still respect the rights of those who did
pick these Board members.

Mark V Anderson
Bancroft


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to