Jim Mork writes:

> Community
> If the goal (or even just one of the goals) of this list is "community
> building", then WHAT sense does it make to retain people who think
> Minneapolis is terrible, finished, or anything negative like that.  I will
> make the modest proposal that only BOOSTERS of Minneapolis, people who
think
> it is a happening place and irreplaceable in Minnesota will ever "build
> community" here.  And the people who live here (or elsewhere) who can't
seem
> to send anything but smears of our city and its habits are merely trying
to
> destroy any community that tries to appear.  I doubt such people really
> build community anywhere.  Whoever this shoe fits might contemplate these
> things.  If you can't say something NICE about Minneapolis, maybe Mom was
> right in saying to keep your thoughts to yourself!

Suffice to say there's a place for critics on the list, even consistent
ones.

Pointing out faults can build community.

Please, eschew the flame wars that inevitably follow a post such as this.

Deal with city issues - the actual substance of people's positions - please.
If you think someone shouldn't be here, email them and make the case, or
email me if they are violating the rules.

I'm serious about this respect thing.

David Brauer
List manager

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to