It makes economic, environmental and public health sense to do this." Rybak continued. "I'm disappointed conversion of Riverside can't be accomplished earlier than 2009. It is, nonetheless a major step forward."
----------------------------------------------
Thanks for the solid support on this. I live REALLY close to the Riverside Plant, and, to say the least, it's foul. Every morning when I walk my dog, I can usually see the masssive emmissions and can always smell it. Like sour milk, one can not but help but be repulsed. But I don't drink sour milk every day, but I do breath every day. So my question is for the Mayor's office and all those involved: Is there a way/plan to reduce toxic emmissions (like scrubbers) before the conversion happens? I'm not sure I can drink sour milk every day for the next five years! (that's 1825 consecutive days!)
Aaron Neumann
Holland
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
