Okay, I fear I might be out of the loop, is this what we have so far?
In an aborted process, a majority of board members who had clearly communicated extensively outside of the formal public process and without notification of anyone including their fellow board members, voted in one meeting to hire a Superintendent of the greatest public park system in the United States an individual who had neither applied nor interviewed for the job yet was known to this group in large part because he was the CEO of a nonprofit which had a publicly subsidized rental agreement in the flagship park property and in turn provided free memberships as gifts to Park Board employees? Am I getting this right? Really? Joseph Barisonzi Willard-Hay REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
