Yes, that appears to be a fairly accurate summation of what happened.In an aborted process, a majority of board members who had clearly communicated extensively outside of the formal public process and without notification of anyone including their fellow board members, voted in one meeting to hire a Superintendent of the greatest public park system in the United States an individual who had neither applied nor interviewed for the job yet was known to this group in large part because he was the CEO of a nonprofit which had a publicly subsidized rental agreement in the flagship park property and in turn provided free memberships as gifts to Park Board employees?
Am I getting this right?
As for Scallon's attempt to fake being on the high road: thus spake the Insider. Keith Reitman has it right.
Questioning blatantly unethical conduct is hardly "negativity."
Chris Johnson Fulton
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
