Eva Young wrote: Anderson's point was that McManus was great at PR over substance.
and: I think Anderson's point was a question about how well McManus manages people. McManus didn't stay in Dayton long enough to follow through with his ambitious reforms. My response: What do you call McManus's experience in Washington DC? Chopped liver? I think that if you make your arguments based on the rather slender information we have about his tenure in Dayton, Ohio, then you are using a rather thin reed. Plus by not including his long-term executive experience in DC, you distort his record. I'd stipulate (and I'm sure McManus would stipulate) that his jump from Dayton, Ohio to Minnepolis is because it is a professional challenge as well as for "quality of life" and family reasons. David Wilson Loring Park REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
