In a message dated 2/13/04 3:10:35 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> they most certainly shouldn't be torn
> down. Historical preservation rational aside
I concur. The example of Pratt is a perfect rationale for preservation.
Not even including the exemplary test scores cited by a previous poster.
Pratt was closed as a school for many years during which it was a
community center and HQ for the Loft among, I'm sure, several other functions. It
reverted to it's original use a few years ago when the need arose. It has again
served its purpose exceedingly well. Why not save it in case the need arises
again?
Ok, the original wing of the place was built in 1898 and I don't know
the extent of improvements that have been made in recent years so that might
have to be addressed but I'm sure it would be cheaper than razing this building
and then having to build another in the near future.
Going back to those test scores; I think Pratt serves a unique service
in the schools bringing together kids from the Projects and kids from the
Professors Ghetto that is Prospect Park. It's a great and learning combination and
should be continued.
Also, on a personal note, it's my only Alma Alma mater.
Jon
Gorder
St. Paul
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
