Somehow, in coming to an accurate cost analysis of the subsidies (both real and imagined), one should probably try and factor-in to what degree the employees of Allina wll be supporting the local economy. I suspect they'll eat plenty of lunches, buy plenty of gas, many will do their banking near work (if it's covenient), many will use local care providers for medical/dental/eyecare and some (heaven forbid) will look at purchasing homes closer to their workplace.
I don't mean to specifically target this at Dennis' remarks so much as the idea shared by a number of people who believe that having the Allina HQ is going to be a big economic benefit to the neighborhood.
For example, one person mentioned the office supplies contract. Here's a perfect example of how fallacious this notion is: Allina like any other large corporation already has a contract for office supplies, company wide. It matters not one iota where any particular Allina office is located -- they all get ordered from the same company and delivered. Allina is not going to change their suppliers just because they moved.
Banking? Gasoline? Sure, the employees will buy where convenient -- like the corner gas station in their suburban neighborhoods, especially since gasoline prices tend to be higher in Minneapolis, and especially in places where there are few competitors, such as around the Abbott NW campus. (E.g. the lone over-priced Amoco station on Chicago.)
One of the reasons Allina and Wells Fargo wanted the 35W Excess Project is so that they could "beam" their employees right into their parking lots without them having to pass through "those" neighborhoods. How likely is it that Jane Suburbanite, who is afraid to drive down 2nd Avenue from the current exit ramp, is going to choose to bank or buy gasoline next to Sears, versus near her home in New Suburban Prairie Grove?
So in reality, the incremental increase in gasoline purchases will be tiny. Likewise the banking, and I'm not sure how banking introduces any new revenue or jobs into the local neighborhood. It's not like you spend much money at the bank.
Lunch? Now there's a real possibility. People do need to eat, and some adventurous souls will no doubt go out into the neighborhood and buy lunch -- maybe at Sunny's Restaurant and Liquors or Chi Lake Cafe.
Many will use local care providers? A few might change from their current providers, but since they are Allina employees, I'd have to guess they'd use the Allina Clinics across the street, don't ya' think?
A few might decide to move to shorten their commutes. Maybe some of them might even move into the city of Minneapolis. And a few of those might even move to a neighborhood near the Sears building -- or not. A fraction of a fraction of a fraction sounds like very few at all.
And when will all this economic gain take place? After the building is rehabbed, after Allina has consolidated all of its employees scattered in other offices and after the dust settles, in a few years.
Meanwhile we are dropping $750,000 in taxes and millions of dollars in 35W Excess development. Seems like it might be cheaper to just give money directly to those businesses and residents in the area that might marginally benefit directly from the presence of Allina employees.
As I said weeks ago, the idea that Allina moving to a building in your neighborhood, no matter where it is, is somehow going to be an economic boon is just plain false. It's just another building to Allina, and just another commuting destination to the existing employees. The situation is quite the opposite of Boston Scientific's announced plans to build a new facility and hire 600 new employees in Maple Grove.
The one big good thing coming out of this is that having Allina buy into part of Sears means that something will finally get done with that building. Whether it will be the most desirable solution or not will not be seen for years to come, but almost anything will be an improvement over a vacant, deteriorating hulk. Depending on what happens with that building, and how successful it is, it could be of significant help to the neighborhood.
That's why the call for the balance sheet is reasonable. Is the millions of tax dollars being filtered through tangentially related projects and enriching various private corporations worth the end results in improvement of our neighborhoods and city? Or would it be cheaper or quicker to spend that money on something that would help more directly? It's hard to answer those questions without objective numbers. All too often it seems the government aids and abets the private interests who will gain by hiding the numbers, or spinning them into useless puffery.
Chris Johnson Fulton
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
