--- Tamir Nolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd make a couple of points about the Stanek saga, ...
> <big snip>
> Second, I don't see how RT Rybak or Bill McManus can quietly accept
Rich Stanek back on the force after this, especially given the internal
changes within the MPD.
[TB] Unfortunately the Mayor and Council agreed to take him back when
he left a bit over a year ago. Now they may have hoped he lasted
longer than the 2 year period during which they agreed to take him
back, but the did agree to take him back. RT Rybak signed the deal.
They knew he was a problem cop. Any cop whose actions cause the city
to get sued and pay either a jury verdict or a settlement is a problem
cop. The city will never change the Police Department if it retains
problem cops on the payroll. Maybe Rybak and the Council would rather
talk about change than actually implement it.
Terrell Brown
Loring Park
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25�
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
