Dan McGuire wrote:

That sounds great ! So, then I presume the developers would be more
than willing to provide a performance bond in the amount of
$500,000,000.00 or so, payable to the city to insure that no damage is
done to the public's enjoyment of the area as it is now.


WM: The last time, when the Eastman tunnel caved in, it was the federal government that paid the cost of putting in the skirting in front of the falls and whatever else it took to put the falls into working order. It's absurd to think that a city this size could come up with and 8-zero figure. Saving the falls was not a matter that affected the general population; it was repaired, "saved" entirely for private industry.

WizardMarks, Central

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to