On May 17, 2004, at 10:49 AM, phaedrus wrote:
If it is relatively straightforward to make a business a private establishment and that establisment would have the right to determine its own smoking policy, then I may have to withdraw my objections to a smoking ban - it all depends on the details.
One common feature of "dry" states and counties, where consumption of alcohol in public places was prohibited, was to form "private" clubs where people had to become members in order to permit the establishment to serve alcohol on the premises. IIRC, in Utah, bars would sell you "memberships" at the door.
Certainly this is a possible exception to the smoking ban that might make sense -- as long as it's not such a wide exception that all bars would feel compelled to become "private" smoking clubs. Perhaps a hard quota on the number of such private clubs in a given area, for example.
If these entities were truly private then some of the "smokers' rights" arguments might apply. But a "private" club open to anyone who walks in the door is the same as a public establishment and should be treated accordingly.
As always, the devil is in the details.
Greg Abbott Linden Hills 13th Ward
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
