I read the post that said that "Secondhand smoke kills tens of thousands of nonsmokers each year in the U.S" and did some research to find if that number was true or just a lie. Public health information said that the number was "maybe 3,000." So, of 285,000,000 inhabitants there are "maybe 3,000" incidents of non smoker lung cancer. This is an estimate and you can look it up at National Cancer Institute at http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/3_9.htm. I chose this web site because it is strongly biased to promote smoking bans. It will be helpful if the proponents of the smoking ban stop using incorrect data and start saying that there is a .0000105% incidence of cancer caused by primary second hand smoke. That is one ten thousandth of one percent. So of ten thousand people, there is a one percent chance. Rank this up there with lightening strikes, shark attacks and death by bee stings. As I stated in an earlier post, this is an issue that must be considered on accurate data. By lying about the facts, proponents of the ban hurt their claim as people largely ignore them because of their unreliability. A smoking ban does very little and will have a negative effect on the city, so it must be considered carefully. So far, the effort to achieve a ban seems to be a show of force by radicals. I hope the good thinkers prevail.
Clark Griffith, Lowry Hill, down wind from the garbage burner, sometimes.


REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to