Mr Driscoll writes: "Why? Smoking doubles the per capita consumption of alcohol."

And where does this statistic come from?  I don't believe there is any scientific 
proof of this statement, only partisan rhetoric.  State your sources, or is this just 
inflammatory rhetoric?

Mr Driscoll writes: "Prohibiting smoking reduces alcohol consumption - at that's 
what's angering
bar owners."

I have never heard that argument, where is this coming from?  State your source.  This 
again sounds like rhetoric to inflame the argument, but with no valid backup.

Mr Driscoll writes: "Now, I find the use of the word totalitarian pretty bizarre. 
Nothing about
legitimate regulation for the public health and safety in the operation of
public accommodations is "totalitarian." The Patriot Act is a display of
totalitarianism at work - where dissent is suspect, perhaps even a crime in
the administration's view; or what we choose to read might make us suspect
with FBI access to our library records, etc. That's where you should direct
your wrath about totalitarianism."

I direct my objection to totalitarianism wherever it occurs.  Just because you believe 
your crusade to be justified, so to does the administration of the Patriot Act.  You 
just agree with one and disagree with the other, so you don't wish to see that both 
are totalitarian acts against the citizenry.  It's apparent that you see dissent over 
the smoking ban issue as suspect.

Mr Driscoll writes: "With booze, the killing of oneself or others is a lot quicker - 
when its user is
drunk or high. Smoking kills just as dead - it just takes more time."

Cirrhosis of the liver?  Long term?  Vegetative state from being hit by impared 
(doesn't have to be legally drunk, .08 is prima facia evidence of intoxication, lower 
levels impair our ability to operate machinery and function in life) driver?

Mr Driscoll write: "With smoking - everyone's an addict and a killer. With drinking, 
only the
abuser, the alcoholic, kills. The rest who drink in moderation aren't
dangerous to themselves and others - until they light up."

Again, any level of alcohol consumption reduces our ability to reason, function and 
operate machinery (cars).  .08 is only the prima facia evidence of intoxication, you 
can be cited for drunk driving with a level lower than .08 if the officer feels you 
are impaired.  To say that smoking kills more than alcohol, is I believe, unfounded.  
State the scientific evidence that says second hand smoke is deadlier than people who 
have been drinking any amount of alcohol and wreaked havoc on others.  I have seen 
many people killed by drunk drivers and most were killed by people who were NOT 
"alcoholics" but rather casual users/abusers (is there a difference?) of alcohol.  
Alcoholics know how to function in society, the casual user does not when drinking.  I 
think you may want to rethink this statement.

Your diatribe Mr. Driscoll is why I use the word Totalitarian.  You will stop at 
nothing to see your ideology through and use misleading and unsubstantiated statements 
to make your case.  That is why this idea of banning everything that may harm people 
must come to an end.  People have the right to make choices.  Businesses have the 
right to make choices.  Government cannot solve all of societies ills.  You don't like 
second hand smoke, don't go to places where it may be.  The EPA study has been shown 
to be flawed.  Don't force the fact that you are having trouble as an ex-addict on 
others.  Because you fear falling back is not a reason to take away the freedom of 
choice of others.  We can continue to ban and legislate ourselves right out of all our 
civil rights.  That is why this is totalitarianism.

Tom Thompson
Como Park




REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to