People in this forum are missing the point. By lifting the opponent's campaign literature Phyllis Kahn obstructed democracy. That's a big deal, though I can see it wouldn't be to many of the democrats who use the courts to obstruct democracy---locally in trying to overturn the 2001 city council elections, and nationally in their efforts to keep Ralph Nader's name off the Presidential ballot.
By lifting the opposing party's literature and calling for early city council elections to get the greens out (BTW, I'm not a member of the Green party), "Representative" Kahn is telling us that we should only have a one-party system. That, in my book, shows a serious ethical deficet. -----------Peter Schmitz, Downtown Saint Paul ________________________________________________________________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today! REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
