Ken Bradley posted: I am fairly certain the Star Tribune did not endorse
Paul Wellstone his first election as well as numerous others that ended
up winning. 

Brandt:  Sorry to bear bad news, Ken, but at our advanced ages, memory
is capable of playing tricks on us.  The Star Tribune editorial page did
endorse Wellstone in his first run.  I'll attach it below.  I just wish
they'd endorse someone to guide voters in the soil and water supervisor
seats.

Access #: 465523
Paper: STAR TRIBUNE (Mpls.-St. Paul) Newspaper of the Twin Cities
Headline: Paul Wellstone for U.S. senator
Date: 19901021 10/21/90
Section: NEWS
Page: 30A
Edition: METRO
Length: 2.5
Subject: editorial;endorsement;campaign;congress
Keys: 1990 senate campaign
Slug: EDIT21

Six years ago we recommended the reelection of Rudy Boschwitz. The
Republican senator seemed then, and seems now, to reflect well the
spirit of the 1980s. But in the 1990s it's time for a change. If
Minnesotans want to send to Washington a senator who in the years
ahead
will reflect their best instincts, one who would fight hard to instill
those ideas in federal law and policy, they will elect Democratic
candidate Paul Wellstone. Like Boschwitz before he entered the
Senate, Wellstone has no
experience in elective office. Like Boschwitz, Wellstone offset that
shortage by work in his party as a national committee member and as a
campaign organizer. Unlike Boschwitz, Wellstone throughout his career
as college professor and political activist has given highest priority
to the poor, the disadvantaged and the dispossessed. His is the right
priority for this state and nation. The means Wellstone would use
to pursue his goals of social
justice are sometimes mistaken. But means can be modified, and would
be, by the give and take of legislating if he became a senator. No
tinkering with technicalities can make up for a lack of commitment. 
Although Boschwitz, too, is strongly committed, too often it is to the
wrong ends: to weakening clean air legislation, to limiting women's
right to choose abortion, to defense programs more suited to the 1980s
than the '90s, and to lesser, silly notions. For example, his defense
of ambassadorships awarded to wealthy campaign contributors is an
embarrassment. Boschwitz does deserve high praise for his work on
farm policy. 
He was coauthor of complicated, important legislation restructuring
the
Farm Credit System. He has worked to give farmers more flexibility in
planting decisions, to separate subsidies from specific crops and to
make U.S. farm products more competitive in world markets. Today's
more prosperous agriculture should persuade Wellstone to rethink his
protectionist views. But Wellstone need not rethink his views on
Americans'
responsibilities to one another and to the world. As a senator he
would insist on ending the disgrace that leaves millions without
adequate health care. He would not be cowed by those on the right who
treat any federal tax increase as a sin. He would not be cowed by
those on the left who rail against sending U.S. forces to the Persian
Gulf. Even more than Rudy Boschwitz, Paul Wellstone would be an
advocate of special interests: Minnesota's interests, and the
nation's.

Steve Brandt
Star Tribune

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to