PRT is electric. You can ride (across the Taxi2000 shop) in the demo
vehicle, look at the motor, listen to the quiet. It's almost like sailing.

--David Shove



On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Resist America wrote:

> In regard to our discussion of PRT, I have to say that
> I like the bus system, but just one thing could be
> improved if it were technically possible. Having
> ridden the LRT enough times now, I think the use of
> the electric motor is the nicest part of it.  The
> noise and fumes are so much less than any form of
> petroelum driven transportation. If there were a way
> that we could have buses driven by electricity, I
> would be very much in favor of evolving by attrition
> to that from diesel buses. I think the time is going
> to come when it will have to happen.  Perhaps the
> initial planning should start as soon as possible.
> Many many years ago, I lived in a city out west that
> neither had street cars no diesel buses. It relied on
> electric buses. But I'd hate to retreat back to that
> system. I'd much rather see some system developed
> where buses could run off batteries that would
> recharge during layovers. Or perhaps some other hybrid
> system.  If fuel cells became feasible, that would be
> excellent, too.
>
> One thing all these discussions fail to ever consider
> is the economic environment.  We seem to look at all
> problems like this in an unchanged economic context.
> But we know that is foolish.  The economic context is
> changing under our feet as we speak.  Let's make sure
> we have a plan that can cope with severe economic
> change.  In a time when even certain conservatives are
> questioning our headlong plunge into resource
> dependence, it makes no sense to plan as if that
> dependence will be forever acceptable.  I think that's
> part of the thinking of PRT adovcates: Don't plan mass
> transit because people will always use their personal
> cars, no matter what the economic environment. We were
> quite lucky in World War II that America had not yet
> become attached to the car.  Gas rationing would have
> been very politically difficult had that happened. And
> I can see some rationing system coming again in the
> future, this time for homeland security.
>
> Minneapolis needs a strategic plan to stay viable in
> these changing economic circumstances.
>
> Jim Mork -- Cooper
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
>
> For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to