Tax the land, not the buildings. No more haggling over valuations. No more armies of tax assessors. No more valuable downtown lots sitting vacant for decades.
Make the change gradually over 30-40 years to allow plenty of time to adjust. Mike Jensvold Ward 10 --- Steve Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Atherton: This counterargument works only if all > property owners > challenge their assessments. If some fraction do > not > then my theory holds. Businesses make "billing" > errors > all the time; it's a time honored strategy. > > Brandt: We're talking downtown skyscrapers with > millions of dollars at stake. These are > sophisticated property owners. There are lawyers > who earn a good living arguing the case for lower > valuations. They argue for a bigger decrease when > valuations are headed down. They argue for a lesser > increase when valuations are headed up. This keeps > assessors on their toes. Your argument works better > if you're dealing with small-time property owners > like me. We're less likely to take time off work to > appear before county and city boards of equalization > to appeal our property values, which people may do > instead of or before going to court. I've never > done so because my homestead, like most, is assessed > for far less than what it is appraised for by my > mortgage lender. And lenders are fairly > conservative. If you want to see an equalization > board in process, they're happening in April and May > at the city level and in June for the county level. > Having observed the county-level board, I can report > that they're interesting for about the first > half-hour. > > Atherton: I thought that the title of the post was > "Skyscraper > valuations going up." > > Brandt: It's like a rollercoaster. Sometimes down, > as in the past few years for downtown property, > often up. > > Atherton: I think that the most important question > is the relationship > between the revenue and debt curves. Do you have an > answer? > > Brandt: I don't cover this area. You can probably > do field research on this in Carol Becker's home > library. Or get the prospectus for the most recent > city debt offering. > > Steve Brandt > Kingfield > > > > REMINDERS: > 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at > http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a > member is in violation, contact the list manager at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. > > 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. > > For state and national discussions see: > http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html > For external forums, see: > http://e-democracy.org/mninteract > ________________________________ > > Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused > Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy > Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] > Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: > http://e-democracy.org/mpls > REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
