Dennis Plante is right, the building is not in Jordan but in McKinley, no difference though. And about the city moving her tenants out.... MOST lease agreements have a buy-out clause. If these particular's did not have a buy out clause, then certainly the residents have the right to pay off the remaining amount of rent owed through the end of the lease, right? If the city gave money to the residents, it is for moving and relocation expenses. Buying out and fulfilling your current lease is part of that relocation expense. If the property owner did not manage the situation & the residents did not fulfill their obligation, it is not the city's fault. The property owner needs to serve papers to the ex-residents telling them what their obligations are financially, if they don't follow through with that, then you take them to court. More effort & expense for the property owner but that's how the game works, cost of doing business. -Megan Goodmundson Jordan
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
