Mark Snyder wrote:

<I believe any referendum taking place would need to be for all of Hennepin
<county, correct?

<Are there any county-wide elections scheduled for Hennepin in 2005? I don't
<believe so and if not, then the earliest a county-wide referendum could take
<place is 2006, unless an election were held simply for a referendum, which I
<don't think is possible.

Hi Mark!  Well, Minneapolis and I assume many other municipalities in the 
county will be having an election on November 2nd.  Why couldn't a county-side 
referendum be held that day?  There would be some cost for holding the 
referendum, especially in parts of the county where nothing else is on the 
ballot, but it would be a tiny amount compared to the cost of the proposed 
public subsidy for the stadium that would be voted on.  Is it State law that 
requires a local referendum only be held at the time there is a general 
election?  I don't know the answer to that.  But even if it is State law, 
supporters of public subsidies are advocating for suspending the section of 
State law that requires a referendum for a local sales tax increase.  It would 
seem, if an adjustment in State law is required, that a stadium bill could just 
as easily address that issue and provide for a referendum to take place this 
November 2nd throughout the area to be taxed (Henn. County).

<So given that a referendum would delay things by at least a year, which
<would almost assuredly increase the cost of the project, one can reasonably
<see how it kind of makes sense why the county and the Twins would seek to
<suspend that requirement without resorting to cynicism about how the
<participants only seek to avoid a referendum because it wouldn't get the
<votes.

I don't think it is cynical to wonder why a referendum is being avoided when 
you have Mike Opat coming right out and admitting that it is unlikely that 
someone who supports the stadium public subsidy could be elected to the county 
board to replace Peter McLaughlin if he is elected mayor and steps down.  That 
is basically conceeding that they are pushing something that does not have the 
support of those to be taxed for this subsidy.

One other question I had regarding the Pioneer Press article yesterday is how 
would Peter McLaughlin be replaced if he wins on November 2 and a vacancy is 
then created on the County Board.  Does that require a special election?  When?

Bruce Shoemaker
Holland neighborhood


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to