I believe you have it Guy Gambill. Or at least part of the answer. It is crazy to spend the number of dollars we do on policing those laws aimed at poverty. It is cheaper to give a homeless person a home than to keep arresting and treating that person for the medical and psychological problems that result from that homelessness.

But shelters are not always the answer either. The cost of a shelter bed is often as much as the cost of a real house. You mention putting facilities housing three or four people scattered throughout the City. It is a good idea, and one we have advocated and fought for years to get as policy for Minneapolis. Rather than paying for shelter bed payments it would be cheaper to team three or four people together and then GIVE them a house.

We have housing room for ALL the homeless in Minnesota sitting rotting down at Fort Snelling. It is even a historic site and asset for Minnesota. Yet our State would rather it rot down than use it for poor people! Why? Probably not enough money for someone to make on the deal. Remember, poverty is a big business in our City. RT Rybak told me personally that the reason he did not ask the State of Minnesota to turn Fort Snelling over to the City of Minneapolis was because he did not want Minneapolis to pay for the police to patrol it. Talk about penny wise and 100 million dollar stupid! So Minneapolis will not take a billion dollars worth of property because it does not want to pay for security? MY, MY, MY, and we wonder why we do not have adequate resources for public safety.

I saw on television how small towns working the system were getting millions of dollars out of that foolish Federal Homeland Security fund. My question is how much is Minneapolis getting and where is it all at? Or is Minneapolis missing the boat because we do not have the City Hall leadership to go get the bacon? Just like we have not had the City Hall leadership to go get the State of Minnesota Bacon. We have to wait until some of it falls off the truck, and have a Mayor that brags it is his doing and he should get the credit because the bacon truck bounced while running over him. We got that little bacon from the State despite City Hall, not because of the Mayor's office.

To go on with this fiscal look at policy - American Indian Community Development Corporation ran a program called KOLA to give services, including medical care, for the homeless. A wonderful program! The program was de-funded. So the clientele instead of getting inexpensive treatment for what might be a small problem is reduced to waiting until it becomes worse then going to "Emergency Rooms". The program continues with volunteers and donations, and saves hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars a year. Those people not having adequate housing is more of a cost that just to the lives of the homeless. Lack of housing also increased costs in police dollars, in court costs, medical care, social workers, you name it, it costs more! Forget about human compassion for a fellow man, it would simply cost tax payers a hell of a lot less dollars to house them rather than to leave them homeless!

It is probably a weird paradox to have "Liberals" telling conservatives that they would show a lot more fiscal responsibility if they took care of the homeless and poor people. For some bizarre reason conservatives and pseudo-liberals would rather spend a hundred thousand dollars a year on a homeless single person, rather than six or seven thousand a year on a home for that person. Even one trip to the hospital with any stay far exceeds any cost for adequate housing, and some homeless are forced to be treated several times a year.

Concentrating those folks in supportive housing institutions, in supportive housing ghettoes, to treat mental illness, alcohol and drugs, sex offenders and all other problems is also not the solution. It is like a family with a dysfunctional member. A caring family can still be functional and caring when there is one dysfunctional member. But if you have two or three dysfunctional members it is overwhelmed and becomes a dysfunctional family. The same is true of a community. It can be a supportive community that gives opportunities and care to a few individuals who are dysfunctional, but NOT to hundreds of such individuals, then it becomes a dysfunctional community that perpetuates the problems and costs. A dysfunctional community where police problems, social problems, addiction problems, and poverty are exacerbated, and an individual's problems are even more exacerbated.

These "Impacted" containment zones do not cost tax payers less, they cost us all more! The homeless person does not cost the taxpayer less he or she costs more. And as Guy reported a large percentage of these homeless people are veterans. Many of their problems can be directly traced to service to their country. Yet rather than them receiving the care and housing we owe them, we pay huge amounts of taxpayer dollars to keep them homeless. Being poor in Minneapolis is a real expensive thing for both the individual and for the taxpayer.

By the way, it costs taxpayers and the City less for GOOD public safety than the bad job we presently are getting. The City as whole becomes much more competitive for business. Property values and taxes go up with it.

Just some thoughts from

Jim Graham,
sett'en on the porch steps in Ventura Village

"The people are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.


We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt."
- Thomas Jefferson


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to