Chris Johnson wrote: Votes for DeLaSalle are votes for patronage, special interests and cronyism -- not because DeLaSalle is a bad school, but rather because the greater public good is done by keeping the park land available to all as open park space, and because of the many problems and ethical lapses in the process arriving at such a decision. ---------------------------- So everyone that opposes your plan or votes against your wishes is doing so NOT because they think it is best, but because they are corrupt? Not one person on the Board honestly believes that this plan for a soccer/football field is a good idea for the city and its parks, they are all just De La Salle lackeys who will do anything to fight for the Islanders? Nice of the anti-playing field crew to keep the argument on the merits and resist attacking the honesty and morals of the Commissioners. They have offered no proof that this is the reasoning behind our Commissioners' votes...Pure self-serving conjecture on their part. Sheesh, can't we do better than just re-writing the defition of "conflict of interest" when it suits us. Anthony Thompson Standish DLS Grad '96 REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
