Ray Marshall wrote:

The major question is, would they want it and use it if they had Internet
service.  I would contend that a very large proportion of them would not
want it, for various reasons:

Trying to decide who will want something that hasn't been created and delivered yet is ...well, not very useful. The internet of the future (five years from now) will be very different from what we have today, especially if access to it is free and the offerings over it are expanded exponentially as they almost surely will be.

Before Minneapolis decides to spend scads of money to provide universal
Internet Service in the City, including the border areas where residents
probably will be able to get it from adjacent communities, lots of
discussion needs to be had.  We are not a Mountain View or a Sunnyvale.
Right now, I would vote for more Police and Community Service Officers than
I would for municipal broadband.
And I say, before Mpls spends scads of money we need to have more discussion to determine whether or not spending the money is even necessary. Somebody like Google might build it for us. There's lots of money to be made delivering products and services over a free public wifi.
Dan McGuire
Ericsson
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to