megan goodmundson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

Eric Mitchell says: After all the things that were/are constantly said about 
Jackie on this list, the only time she stepped in was to set that person 
straight that you are speaking of is when he brought her husband into this and 
accused him of representing massage parlors and
strip joints and possibly owning stake in them. As you put it, it not only 
brought a 'disgusting
personal tone' but, it was a complete lie. So I'm sure you can understand, 
after all four years later you find that almost exact thing nasty and 
disgusting. Eric Mitchell St Paul(5Th Ward last go round)

My thoughts are this: 

1) Don Samuels did not pull Travis Lee in to this, Travis inserted himself into 
the nastiness that spews from Natalie's campaign several months ago when he 
began to use his porn magazine to campaign for Natalie and campaign against 
Don, tactics which include a re-occuring column written by a fake named person 
that is full of mis-truths as well as a political cartoon with race-baiting 
captions. 

2) I find it extremely ironic that 4 years ago, Natalie's campaign was accusing 
Cherryholmes' husband of being involved in the sex industry, or whatever... 
cause currently, a downtown strip club named Augie's is both an advertiser in 
Natalie's husband's porn magazine AS WELL AS a financial contributor to 
Natalie's campaign



TN:  These are my thoughts:

 

1.) The magazine to which you are referring is NOT a porn magazine, but even if 
it were, Larry Flint (of Hustler) frequently contributes to Democratic 
candidates. Whatever your views may be, this genre IS protected by the first 
amendment and only the RELIGIOUS RIGHT wants it completely banned and has a 
problem with it's complete existence.  Perhaps you and Don Samuels agree with 
the ideological aims of the religious right, I don't know.  

 

Also, (never having seen the magazine or the articles in it) how do you know 
that the person who wrote articles is fake.  For all you know, maybe I'm fake.  

 

As to Travis Lee's inserting himself in to the campaign, he has EVERY RIGHT to 
campaign for his wife!!!  That doesn't give Samuels the right to personally 
attack members of Council Member Johnson-Lee's immediate family.

 

Neither NJL nor any of her supporters have brought CP Samuels family in to 
this.  It's still ugly. It's still nasty.  

 

A public official who behaves in this way during the course of a campaign can 
also behave this way in office (i.e., dig in to and distort the personal lives 
of their constituents and intimidate them when the official doesn't like what 
the constituents have to say.)  It shows the personal views and the character 
of CP Samuels.  It shows how far he'll go.

 

2.) The list member about whom we're talking (the one who Cherryhomes 
threatened, yes threatened) had no position on Natalie Johnson-Lee's campaign 
and if fact had some ideological differences with NJL.  

 

3.) There are a lot of working class lower income folks, not just in the 5th 
ward, but all over Minneapolis for whom NJL works very hard, and not just 
people of color....she works hard for cab drivers, people who've been abused by 
those in power, people who can't figure out how to navigate the maze at City 
Hall, all those folks at the Hard Times which the Cherryhomes council tried to 
shut down...and there so many others. I am one of those people.  

 

Neither Don Samuels nor his supporters are able to fight this purely on 
ideological grounds.  If they did, they'd loose because their ideology is 
primarily anger and resentment

 

It's obvious to me that the supporters of the former president who are now 
supporting Don Samuels resent US for getting the little bit of representation 
we got in 2001.  

 

They believe we have no right to representation at City Hall and they can't 
wait to disenfranchise US again.

 

The blatant hostility of some people working on the Samuels campaign (and it 
seems Samuels himself) towards anyone who disagrees with their views is plainly 
obvious.  Fortunately (one would hope,) the majority of the 5th ward, as well 
as the rest of Minneapolis is much more tolerant.

 

Tamir Nolley,

 

9-9



                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
 Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to