Report from Admin and Fin Committee

7.1 Adopt the Commissioners budget priorities for the 2006 budget ( based on surveys turned in by 7, vs the 4 last meeting, commissioners )

GM for Administration Don Siggelkow

The duty of the board is to..
  Decide property tax policy
  Set fee policies
  Define services we will provide
  Define service levels
  Set salaries and benefits
How these policies are then implemented are up to the superintendent and staff to work out (I hope that there are SOME boundaries on how )

Do you have a line item budget? yes Can you have one? just ask ( Can the public ask??? I am asking!!!!)

He then showed the compilation numbers that staff arrived upon from the 7 commissioner surveys they received

Commissioner Hauser asks for the differentiation in Fees 1 and Fees 2

1) what the MPRB presently collects ( as a percentage of the total cost) and 2) the average % the commissioners would like to see recovered

Commissioner Young asks how the MPRB is dealing with increased costs for energy, health insurance and pensions and where would these costs be found

GM Siggelkow points out the healthcare will rise 20% this year ( 1/2 million ) but there is a one time increase in LGA this year so the board is not facing budget cuts. Energy costs are expected to increase between $150,000-$175,000 and pensions are handled by the city and historically have not been an issue for the MPRB

Commissioner Young as head of the Operations and Environment committee notes that Maintenance seems to take big hits when the staff chooses where to cut. How can the Commissioners vote to keep more maintenance.

GM Sigglekow responds that they need to specify this and pick a different area to cut

Commissioner Erwin points out that the top 10 are in pretty basic categories like tree removal and replanting, youth sports and supervision and building and field maintenance he also mentions some on the bottom like the horse patrol and storm response (gee, just after the last meeting storm response was very important in reality) he then asks when the there will be specific discussion and if the board will meet as a committee of the whole to do this?

Commissioner Dziedzic points out that when they we last elected there were 137 parkkeepers and now only 115, can the dept absorb more cuts

GM Schmidt admits it could be done but the system would have to change (Hey Mike... are you talking about outsourcing union jobs here????? )

Commissioner Dziedzic and President Olson have words over how long Commissioner Dziedzic has been speaking

Commissioner Mason states that in her 8 1/2 years there have never been discussions about the specifics in regard to budgeting (amongst the commissioners) and that it mostly came to picking where to do eliminations. She then makes a motion for a meeting of the board as a Committee of the Whole where the budget talks will be the only agenda item.

Commissioner Berry Graves seconds the motion and would like more details from GM Schmidt about his last statement ( Liz would too) She is hearing that we are maintaining at the current level and that people want it better so what options would be needed.

OPEN TIME

President Olson has 11 people signed up for OPEN TIME and 15 minutes available so doing the math comes up with 1 minute 20 sec per speaker (but there were not 11 people and he should maybe have confirmed that )

Barb Stevens of the West Calhoun Neighborhood shows maps of Lake Calhoun and points out where they need Stop signs for safety. There are 5 stop signs on the other side of the lake along the Parkway and they have ZERO. She mentions petitions ( 95% of those asked, signed )

Mary Tate presents the resolution and the signed petitions requesting stop signs at W 36TH ST, W 32ND ST, and at the exit for the parking lot at the Lake Calhoun Executive Center. They would like to prevent a tragedy from happening in a 25mph zone where speeds average nearer 40 mph

Meg Fourney
In light of the Board recently taking the initiative for a comprehensive look at Lake Calhoun, and now taking into account these residents' comments, I would like to remind the Board of 3 items: 1) In 1997, appointed to the Park Board's Parkway Traffic Study, I served to address effective and consistent traffic calming methods. Clearly West Calhoun is inconsistent with East Calhoun, as they have stop signs at every intersection and West Calhoun has none. The 2004 Traffic Study Addendum suggests raised pedestrian crosswalks are effective. 2) The Chain of Lakes Study, with architect Michael Van Valkenberg, addressed commuter use of the Parkways through the continuous parkway intersections, and suggested breaking the continuous path with t-intersections. Commuter traffic has seriously increased since his recommendations. Breaking the pattern is essential. These t-intersections, as well as other alternatives to decrease commuter traffic need revisiting. 3) The shared private-public parking lot at the Lake Calhoun Executive Center, although it is seriously under-utilized-still after a dozen years of this shared use agreement, the use has significantly increased in the amount of pedestrian crossings from that lot to the lake, across West Calhoun Parkway. This is a serious "blinded" crossing. the elimination of parking bays should be examined.

I hope the Board will address the West Calhoun inconsistencies and be pro-active in setting a balanced comprehensive plan for Lake Calhoun that re-evaluates the public's use and enjoyment in light of private use and development.

(text provided by Ms. Fourney)

Liz Wielinski
I would like to thank you for again providing me with this OPEN TIME opportunity to address the board.

In 2004 while setting the budget for the current year the superintendent recommended the following to balance the budget...

1) Current positions that will be held vacant during the transition and historical ( $353,000 ) But then Mr. Hokeness and Mr. Oyanagi were hired (apprx $90,000 each)

2) Eliminate contributions to Midtown Greenway ($20,000) and Brain Coyle ($18,000 ) On March 2, 2005 the funding for the Midtown Greenway is restored.

3) Contractual reductions for public relations, archives, historian and youth sports ( $28,000) We now have the talented Ms. Sommers ( approx $13,000 for 1/4 year)


By my reckoning cuts of $419,000 are now down to $215,000. Where did the $200,000 come from?

The other part of the 2005 budget that has me concerned is the 1/2 million dollar Superintendent's Innovation Fund. It was billed as a fund for one time investments that could produce long term savings. I would like to have an accounting of the Innovation Fund from January to the present given by the accounting staff, maybe Rich Theis the Finance Manager could bring everyone up to date in a staff presentation. I think it would serve everyone well to see how last years budget decisions have panned out going into this years plan. Hopefully at that time he could also report on whether the Park Permanent Improvement Fund deficit fund balance as of Dec. 31, 2004, was paid back with capital program money and/or private contributions in 2005 as stated in the 2004 Annual Financial Report.

Commissioner Hauser makes a comment about the Innovation Fund being tabled ( since when does that mean you folks aren't spending the money???? )

Joan Berthiaume and Ted Wirth offer an open invitation to all board members and the public to the Historic Theodore Wirth House in Lyndale Farmstead Park on Saturday the 8th of October from noon to 4pm

Brad Pass
Mr. Pass lives one block south of East Phillips Park and also served on the Cities' Long-range Improvement Committee (CLIC) After having seen the MPRB's requests for funding from CLIC he was mad that the kids of East Phillips Park who are some of the poorest in the city were once again passed over for a recreation center and that the MPRB felt that $1.2 million dollars for astro turf at Parade Stadium was a more worthy project

Carol Pass
Mrs. Pass protested the plan for expenditures at CLIC and is ashamed and embarrassed that the MPRB keeps passing over the very deserving kids and adults of the East Phillips area and thinks the MPRB priorities are bad. Unlike other parts of town, the parents from her area are often single parents working more than one job and do not have the time to come to these meetings and state their opinions. She will be letting everyone including the media know how she feels about the rotten priorities this board has set in regards to her neighborhood.

Bill Zeigler, Executive Director , Little Earth United Tribes
Mr. Zeigler thanks the MPRB police for their stepped up patrolling of Cedar Fields. He then goes on to say that Mrs. Pass has hit it on the head. 75% of the population in his area is under 18 ( 500 kids ) and most are from families living on less than $18,000 a year. ( Mr. Zeigler, Mr. Pass and Mrs. Pass are directed to Judd Rietkerk of the planning dept )


End Part 2

more about the budget and renting out the Stone Arch Bridge still to come....

Liz Wielinski
Columbia Park

www.mplsparkwatch.org

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to