Steve writes:

So it is okay in your capitalist mind for Wal-Mart to tell Rubbermaid that you will produce this much of this item and we will pay you only this much or we will take our business elsewhere thus forcing many companies in America to close their plants here and open up new ones in places with cheap labor like China--but it is not okay for those who represent the people whose jobs have been lost to such tactics to make a demand of living wages and health coverage for businesses that wish to receive contracts over $100.000.00 of those same workers taxes?

America needs business as long as business provides jobs with wages that allow for individual growth economically. The ability for an individual to "get ahead" in their lives through hard work has long been part of America's social contract with its corporations--until Ronald Reagan came along and the only gage of success became the number of dollars in the bank and the growth in the dividend at the end of the quarter. Twenty years of this short-sighted economics have nearly destroyed this country and it is time for our government--note "our" government, not corporate stooges who get elected to protect corporate interests over public ones--to once again start drafting legislation that will level the playing field in the workplace and return the focus of corporate decision making to ALL stakeholders instead of all stockholders.

Our corporations have the wherewithall to pay good wages but they lack the will to tell the stockholders that the dividend this quarter will only be up 10% instead of 20%. We wonder why our economy seems so sluggish without bothering to look at the glaring fact that corporate employees are also customers and how can you expect a vigorous economy when your customers have no money. It was just reported that the average American is carrying $80,000 in credit card debt and most of it is not going into new products but simple food and shelter and utility bills with cheap clothing thrown in.

Corporations exist currently with only one objective--make money. They are doing that very effectively at the expense of the rest of us. Government is there to act as the conscience that we exempt corporations from having. It is perfectly reasonable for the government to look out for the best interests of the entire community and the living wage ordinance is a good tool to that end.

Steve Nelson
Willard Hay


Mark writes:

Steve, thanks for the feedback. We clearly have a different view of the proper role of government. A couple of point in response.

- I don't shop at Wal-Mart. Your example is a good illustration of why I've never spent a dime there. But, that's a personal choice of mine, and I don't know that I need everybody to agree with it. Shopping at Wal-Mart isn't illegal.

- I need help understanding your statement that 'American needs business as long as business provides jobs with wages that provide for individual growth economically'. Are you implying that there is a scenario where America wouldn't need business, if certain conditions aren't met?

- Re: those greedy corporations - who do you think holds stock in publicly held corporations? A lot of it is held by pension funds, for both public and private sector employees. I don't know the %, but a lot of pension $ are in the stock market. The idea that only the very wealthy are invested in the stock market just isn't true.

- if our country headed down the economic road to perdition during the Reagan administration, how do you explain the much-vaunted boom years when Clinton was in the White House?

Have a good weekend.

Happy that it's Friday in Prospect Park

Mark Hanson


REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to