1.  6th Ward Race
2.  8th Ward Race
3.  10th Ward Race
4.  EM Boatner's column on Gay Youth Programs
5. My response to Mike Krause's column on local races and need for gays to focus on legislative special elections
6.  Lilligren Campaign Polling Calls to Voters

Lavender Magazine has an article about the 6th Ward Race

http://www.lavendermagazine.com/artman/publish/article_1502.php

Candidate Dean Zimmerman drew a sharp contrast between he and openly Gay Robert Lilligren in that race:

Zimmermann, in answer to the statement that the choice between him and Lilligren will be tough for many GLBT voters, remarks, "Tough? What's tough about it? I have a history of being outspoken on questions of civil liberties.

"When the issue of equal benefits for spouses/partners came up at the Council, I and Council Member Lisa Goodman were the only ones who spoke up about how the gays on our Council were being short-changed."

Zimmermann adds, "Robert just sat there on his hands. I think this shows the clear difference between Bob and me.

"Whether it is GLBT issues, policy issues, or constituent service, I'm not just a vote; I am an advocate."

Dean Zimmerman's Ad:

Dean on his bicycle in his Green Tutu, standing next to the Fire Chief (disclaimer says that photo doesn't imply endorsement).

*************************************************************
8th Ward candidate interviews in Lavender:
http://www.lavendermagazine.com/artman/publish/article_1503.php
All 8th ward candidates support gay marriage.

10th Ward Race:

Scott Persons has an effective ad that has non-Minneapolis resident, Paul Skrbec (Stonewall DFL Chair) promoting him. Ralph Remington has an Ad - but the ad gives no information beyond his name.

Ralph Remington has made his Stonewall screening answers public here:

http://www.ralphremington.com/STONEWALLquestions.htm

I'd like to challenge Scott Persons to make his Stonewall screening answers public - because many gay voters would just as soon see both questionairs then make their own decisions on who to vote for.
**************************************************************************
Lavender:
Managing Editor EM Boatner discusses Gay Youth:

http://www.lavendermagazine.com/artman/publish/article_1528.php

<<Time Magazine in its October 10 issue and our "Northland Notes" column this issue both address the issue of out gay youngsters, making me aware of a trend I didn't even know existed.

According to John Cloud's feature article in Time, Ritch Savin-Williams's recently published The New Gay Teenager (Harvard University Press, 2005), and numerous other sources, I learned that thousands of kids are coming out as young as 13 and 14.

This avalanche of new queer youth has come as a surprise (and shock) not only to the religious and conservative right, but also to the GLBT community itself, which, for the most part, has focused youth-oriented efforts on the troubled, the homeless, substance abusers, or hustlers." >>

Read the whole thing.

Krause analysis of Minneapolis/St Paul Races - especially Minneapolis:

Lavender columnist, Mike Krause discusses the "political maturity" of the GLBT community:

http://www.lavendermagazine.com/artman/publish/article_1506.php

Lisa Vecoli, a GLBT activist who herself ran for a State Senate seat from South Minneapolis in 2000, observes that GLBT political power built up over the last 20 years is being undermined, at least this year, as much by political apathy as any other factor.

Vecoli helped engineer the endorsement of the Stonewall DFL Caucus for Minneapolis mayoral candidate Peter McLaughlin, but she acknowledges that the GLBT vote in the city seems to be fairly evenly split between McLaughlin and incumbent Mayor R.T. Rybak.

Some analysts would argue that having the GLBT vote spread among many candidates and campaigns is a sign of a maturing political movement.

It also reflects that support for the civil rights of GLBT residents, at least within most of the urban area, is a consensus issue not even part of the political debate.

This year, GLBT voters are more likely to decide among the mayoral candidates based on their positions on the city- and county-enacted smoking bans as on a candidate's positions on GLBT issues.

EY: This shows that in Minneapolis Stonewall DFL's endorsement does not translate into GLBT votes. This was true 4 years ago also.

What Krause is missing is political gays in MN focus excessively on Minneapolis and St Paul - at the expense of working on swing legislative districts. Log Cabin Republicans of Minnesota has met with and had a good discussion with Plymouth candidate Judy Johnson. Johnson will also be meeting with the anti-gay groups: Minnesotans for Marriage (misnamed), and the Minnesota Family Council (also misnamed). The meeting was an introduction meeting - not a screening session. Three of us went and observed the Republican District convention district 43. Unlike the 58th District convention in Minneapolis (and from what I've heard of the 59th district convention), there was no wingnuttery, no anti-gay lit pieces, no speeches about people marrying animals - or perhaps trees (this was congressional candidate Dan Matthias's speech) - just discussion of accountable government. Judy Johnson is President of the League of Cities - and used to live in Minneapolis. She used to intern for John Derus. Some democrats have encouraged her to join the Democratic Party - and she is staying in the Republican party. Friends of mine in Stillwater said that Stonewall was not there helping when the notoriously anti-gay Michele Bachmann was running in 2000 and 2002. Stonewall DFL's assistance could have made the difference in those races.

Voter Reg Campaign call paid for by Lilligren campaign:

For original post, see Lloydletta's Nooz:
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com/2005/10/is-robert-lilligren-campaign-doing.html

Barb Lickness and Mark Snyder respond:
At 10:14 AM 10/16/2005, Mark Snyder wrote:
On 10/16/05 9:24 AM, "Barbara Lickness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nothing nefarious going on here Eva. I don't know why you would say the call > was "strange". There are no "strange" questions being asked. Pretty run of the
> mill for a political campaign in my mind. Certainly as long as you have
> mingled in politics you can't think polling voters is a new or "strange"
> phenomenon. The woman doing the polling is not "from the Lilligren campaign" > as you quoted, she was hired by the campaign. There is quite a difference in
> those meanings.

Might Eva or Barbara share what the questions being asked were, which would
allow the rest of us to decide whether they are "strange" or not?

Barb continues:

Robert is mailing literature to the voters, doorknocking the voters, appearing at events and celebrations voters are hosting and yes, educating them to get registered, showing them where to vote and polling them through an independent source to find out who they may be supporting and what their issues are.

Robert wants to convince the voters of the 6th ward that he is passionate about his desire to represent them, that he is working hard to get their vote and through his accomplishments as a freshman council member that he is the best choice to represent the people of the 6th ward.

Barb:
Thank you for clarifying that Russell. I would also like to state that
the Lilligren campaign is definately NOT engaged in push polling. We
are just polling voters.  Robert has guided all of us who are working on
his campaign to stay on the "high road" and run a campaign based on the
issues and why he is the best person to represent the 6th ward during
the next term.

Barb Lickness
Whittier
Avid supporter of Robert Lilligren in the 6th.

EY:
What bothered my source is this person said they were doing calling from a non-partisan organization - Voter Registration Service. She asked them who they were working for - and eventually the woman admitted to working for the Lilligren campaign.

The call ended at that point. I told my source that when she gets calls like that - she should find out what the questions are and take notes - then find out who is calling.

I called both campaigns at the numbers listed on campaign website. There was someone available at the Zimmerman campaign who told me someone else had reported something similar. Robert Lilligren's voice answered the campaign number, but he has not returned

Unless I hear otherwise, thank you Barb Lickness for stating clearly and directly the Lilligren campaign just hired a firm to do polling for the campaign.


Eva Young
Near North
Minneapolis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lloydletta's Nooz
http://lloydletta.blogspot.com
Dump Michele Bachmann
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759,
US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician, & printer (1706 - 1790)
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1381.html

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to