Laura and lloyd wrote:
I think voters do not vote because they do not have sufficient
motivation to do so. I would not call that apathy. I would not give it
any sort of label.
I've spoken to perhaps hundreds of people who got sort of vague when I
asked them if they planned on voting this year. I did my best to give
great reasons for voting and I'm sure I succeeded with some. But with
some, I could still see a hesitancy after we talked. It is not a lack of
concern about who gets elected. It isn't fear, either.
I'd guess that for some they live in a world of too many choices to
make. Time for them is a shrinking commodity. For some reason that we do
not know, voting drops down the priority list in their crowded lives. I
think the challenge is to raise that civic duty on the priority list,
but do so without blaming. The more we blame, the more some of these
will retreat into their independence to exercise an option.
Laura's first sentence is on the mark: insufficient motivation to do so. I
agree with her reasons beyond that, but I disagree that they are the only ones
(if that's what she intended to imply -- I'm not sure) and that apathy is not
among them.
For some voters, I think it truly is apathy. In some cases it is apathy born
of disconnect -- they see no obvious connection between their vote and
results. In other cases, they are comfortable and none of the choices seem to
upset the apple cart much, so apathy is again born.
For other voters, it is a sort of despondency. Why bother voting when the
corrupt powers that be will always gain the upper hand? The deck is stacked,
negative campaigns sway more voters who do vote than honest issues, and once
elected, corruption, self serving and inside dealing control most government
decisions. Why waste time in futile efforts to vote for allegedly good people?
For some voters, it is simple futility, pure and simple. They know the
elections are bogus, so why bother? They know the few educated voters choices
will be far outnumbered by the majority -- those who have non-public special
interests or those who have been deceived by the former group.
For others, I agree again, there are too many choices, not enough time and too
little information. The media gives us regurgitated spin and scattered
factoids, instead of fulfilling their real responsibilities as the 4th estate.
Election day should be a national holiday. Election day should be around the
same day as tax day, not nearly as far away from it as possible. Media which
get control over public facilities (e.g. broadcast TV and radio) should be
required to provide more than adequate coverage as part of their licenses.
But I don't think even those suggested changes would fix low voter turnout.
The system is corrupt and broken. Until society fixes that, voters will
remain uninterested in going through the motions of pretending that the
government is of the people, by the people and for the people.
Feeling cynical after a terribly low turnout and especially distorted election,
--
Chris Johnson
Fulton
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
