>rrdtool only comes up with NaN for an interval if more than Minimal required
>heartbeat seconds of the interval are UNKNOWN ...
Tobi,
Can I request an option to ignore heartbeat when it set to 0 or -1?
Something like:
287,289c287
< rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt >= interval &&
< rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt >0
< ) {
---
> rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt >= interval) {
393,394c391
< > rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt
< && rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt > 0 ) ||
---
> > rrd.ds_def[i].par[DS_mrhb_cnt].u_cnt) ||
I can understand for those data types related to delta time, it is
necessary to save guard the data by using heartbeat. However, some
absolute data such as CPU/memory usage, the right action is to round
the timestamp upto the closest step, instead of losing data by NaN. I
don't think raising the heartbeat(what I do) is the answer.
Min
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers