On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:55:08PM -0500, Tim Sheets wrote: > What affect does using (or not using) 'Options: bits' have on things > such as ifInErrors?
You are showing bits (bytes) per second. > If the numbers collected are presented in Bytes by default, and using > the option 'bits' scales and presents them in (bytes * 8), wouldn't the > same thing be true for other OID's? Yes. > In other words, should one use 'Options: bits' when collecting errors > and such? It'd look a bit strange but it is valid. Receiving 504 bits and getting 8 errored bits. > I use 'Options: bits' as a standard, so never really thought about it. Maybe you should. That doesn't mean you shouldn't use this as a standard, it just means you should think about it. HTH Alex -- http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
