Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:18:35PM +0000, Jim Mozley wrote: > > >> . No changes have been made to the configuration. The only >>think I can think that was different to the norm was that the interfaces >>were passing a constant volume of data, rather than the usual varying >>traffic. > > > If you mean ___*really*___ constant, this usually is a sign that MRTG > was unable to read the remote device _and_ that you have no "UnknAsZero" > option set. > > When monitoring resumes, the gap in time is filled with the rate at > that time, resulting in a somewhat large amount of time having the > same rate. > > This does not explain any of the other problems you describe but I'd > like to let you know anyway. > > HTH > Alex
Thanks Alex for pointing this out, but the reason it was constant (I should have said nearly constant) was because a traffic generator was being used at a constant output. I'm aware of the UnknAsZero option. I guess the cause will remain unknown; the graph showed around 150 Mb/s during the network testing on the daily graphs (when it should have been around 115 Mb/s) and now shows correctly on the weekly graph at around 115 Mb/s. Thanks again, Jim -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
