Hi Steve, Just tried your suggestions and no luck.
Target[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:[email protected]: ::::2 MaxBytes[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 2879620294 Title[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: [piper.ddrit.com]: Disk Usage Kilo[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 1024 Unscaled[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: ymwd ShortLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: B YLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization Legend1[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load) Legend2[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load) Legend3[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Legend4[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: LegendI[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization LegendO[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Options[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: gauge, integer, transparent, noborder, nobanner, nolegend, growright And in the log: 1342940452 21985147 *732136646 *21985147 *732136646* The number in red should be 2879620294 On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Steve Shipway <[email protected]>wrote: > Are you using 'option[]: gauge' (you probably should be)? > Can you use SNMPv2 (with these large numbers best to do this)? > > Steve > > *Steve Shipway* > University of Auckland ITS > *UNIX Systems Design Lead* > [email protected] > Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487 > ** > ------------------------------ > *From:* > [email protected][mrtg-bounces+s.shipway= > [email protected]] on behalf of Peter Dolkens [ > [email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, 22 July 2012 6:19 p.m. > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mrtg] Issue with MRTG and explicit OIDs > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to set up some disk monitoring on my Synology NAS, using > MRTG (windows). > > The Target I'm using is: > Target[piper.ddrit.com_DISK]: > 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:[email protected] > > If I query either of these values via the command line, I get a > correct result. > If I query either of these values individually in MRTG, I get a correct > result. > If I use the line above, then the 2nd value has 2147483648 subtracted > from the collected values. > > Does anyone know why it's doing this, or how to fix it? > > It's annoying because I'm intending to expand my NAS, and using this > counter, I could theoretically display relative capacity usage > (displayrelpercent) but right now MRTG can't seem to collect the 2nd > counter properly, which is putting a damper on things. > > Thanks, > Pete >
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
