Hi again, Upon further investigation, it appears that these counters are reporting that they're "Integer32" values, and being treated as signed values. Is there any way I can override that to be "Counter32", which, I assume, is unsigned?
Thanks, Pete On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Peter Dolkens <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Just tried your suggestions and no luck. > > Target[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: > 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:[email protected]: > ::::2 > MaxBytes[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 2879620294 > Title[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: [piper.ddrit.com]: Disk Usage > Kilo[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 1024 > Unscaled[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: ymwd > ShortLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: B > YLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization > Legend1[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load) > Legend2[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load) > Legend3[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: > Legend4[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: > LegendI[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization > LegendO[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: > Options[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: gauge, integer, transparent, noborder, > nobanner, nolegend, growright > > And in the log: > 1342940452 21985147 *732136646 *21985147 *732136646* > > The number in red should be 2879620294 > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Steve Shipway > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Are you using 'option[]: gauge' (you probably should be)? >> Can you use SNMPv2 (with these large numbers best to do this)? >> >> Steve >> >> *Steve Shipway* >> University of Auckland ITS >> *UNIX Systems Design Lead* >> [email protected] >> Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487 >> ** >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* >> [email protected][mrtg-bounces+s.shipway= >> [email protected]] on behalf of Peter Dolkens [ >> [email protected]] >> *Sent:* Sunday, 22 July 2012 6:19 p.m. >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [mrtg] Issue with MRTG and explicit OIDs >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to set up some disk monitoring on my Synology NAS, using >> MRTG (windows). >> >> The Target I'm using is: >> Target[piper.ddrit.com_DISK]: >> 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:[email protected] >> >> If I query either of these values via the command line, I get a >> correct result. >> If I query either of these values individually in MRTG, I get a correct >> result. >> If I use the line above, then the 2nd value has 2147483648 subtracted >> from the collected values. >> >> Does anyone know why it's doing this, or how to fix it? >> >> It's annoying because I'm intending to expand my NAS, and using this >> counter, I could theoretically display relative capacity usage >> (displayrelpercent) but right now MRTG can't seem to collect the 2nd >> counter properly, which is putting a damper on things. >> >> Thanks, >> Pete >> > >
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
