Well, I think the "preferred" solution is the one which works! And the Qt
Creator-driven compile-link-debug works nicely enough (ad largely
out-of-the-box) on Linux, with the added bonus of an integrated IDE (I used
to use it also on Windows, before giving up with Microsoft OSes, and it also
worked; debugging was slower, but manageable).


akdor1154 wrote
> <p>
> Ah, I was soley building with the Makefile and mucking with CMakeLists, I
> didn't think to try with Qt Creator / qmake. The Readme suggests to 
> <pre>
> #make revision; make;
> </pre>
>  &ndash; is Qt Creator / qmake preferred? (and if so, should the readme be
> updated?) This would have made my source build easier to find as well, I
> guess.
> </p>
> 
> <p>
> As an aside, I tried by using the Qt .run install instead of a source
> build (my source build was silently failing to build QtWebKit), it still
> didn't work, but then after deleting the source build and a git pull,
> everything works fine. Odd..
> </p>
> 
> <p>
> Cheers,
> <br />
> &ndash; Jarrad
> </p>





--
View this message in context: 
http://dev-list.musescore.org/Can-t-build-Git-version-on-Ubuntu-13-10-x64-fails-linking-mscore-tp7578667p7578677.html
Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to