Hallo Ivanko, Du schriebst am Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:42:36 +0500:
> Also IDE's executable may have its SUID bit set :) Which would be a _very_ bad idea. Additionally, the IDE itself doesn't do anything to any object file - it has them worked at by the compiler only. So to let a user build any piece of the (system wide available) run time library, it would be sufficient to set the _compiler_ suid root - which is an equally bad idea. _No_ system library should be alterable by any regular user. If a compiler tries to (re-) compile any piece of this, it simply is broken, or at least some part of its basic setup is. If there should be the case that a compiler needs to create application dependend object files from system wide installed source files, it should be set up in such a way as to produce them in the same place as the application's own object files, or maybe in a separate directory _owned by the same user_. And that's just what fpc does on my machine, so there have to be options available to effect this - and they must even be the default ones, as that's what I'm using. -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
